Grab our RSS Feed

Who Cares About Wal-Mart?

by Carl Lindskoog


Nel­son Licht­en­stein, The Retail Rev­o­lu­tion: How Wal-Mart Cre­ated a Brave New World of Busi­ness. Met­ro­pol­i­tan Books, 2009

Bethany More­ton, To Serve God and Wal-Mart: The Mak­ing of Chris­t­ian Free Enter­prise. Har­vard Uni­ver­sity Press, 2009

Many New York­ers might won­der what use it is to under­stand a com­pany like Wal-Mart. After all, with no Wal-Marts in the city most of us aren’t Wal-Mart shop­pers, and the social and polit­i­cal cul­ture of New York is far dif­fer­ent from the one we reg­u­larly asso­ciate with Wal-Mart. Isn’t Wal-Mart sim­ply a red state thing? Why should any­one not in “Wal-Mart Coun­try” bother try­ing to under­stand this phenomenon?

In two impor­tant new works, his­to­ri­ans Nel­son Licht­en­stein and Bethany More­ton each seek to answer those ques­tions. To under­stand the impor­tant changes in the United States (and even the world) in the last thirty years we must under­stand Wal-Mart, they argue. Whether you are inter­ested in polit­i­cal, eco­nomic, or cul­tural his­tory, Licht­en­stein and More­ton each make a pow­er­ful case for the deci­sive influ­ence of Wal-Mart.

In The Retail Rev­o­lu­tion: How Wal-Mart Cre­ated a Brave New World of Busi­ness, Nel­son Licht­en­stein offers a com­pre­hen­sive view of the com­pany, detail­ing where it came from and how it became the largest retailer and pri­vate sec­tor employer in the world. A dis­tin­guished labor his­to­rian who has also made major con­tri­bu­tions to the his­tory of pol­i­tics and polit­i­cal econ­omy, Licht­en­stein goes beyond Wal-Mart’s impact on Amer­i­can labor, pol­i­tics and the econ­omy. As the title sug­gests, The Retail Rev­o­lu­tion seeks to explain how Wal-Mart, as the “van­guard of the retail rev­o­lu­tion,” has over­thrown the pre­vi­ously dom­i­nant form of global polit­i­cal econ­omy and has ush­ered in “a new stage in the his­tory of cor­po­rate capitalism.”

In each chap­ter Licht­en­stein focuses on a dif­fer­ent aspect of Wal-Mart’s his­tory and con­tem­po­rary story. Telling the story of Wal-Mart’s ori­gins, Licht­en­stein places the company’s ascen­dance at the end of a one-hundred year period in which man­u­fac­tur­ers dom­i­nated the Amer­i­can econ­omy. Sam Wal­ton, Wal-Mart’s founder and patri­arch, grew up in a world where retail­ers played sec­ond fid­dle to man­u­fac­tur­ers. But by the 1970s — Wal-Mart’s “mir­a­cle decade,” in which the com­pany cracked the $1 bil­lion sales mark — man­u­fac­tur­ers’ dom­i­nance was com­ing to an end.

In one of the most inter­est­ing chap­ters of this fas­ci­nat­ing book, Licht­en­stein explains just how Wal­ton was able to raise Wal-Mart to such heights. Through an inno­v­a­tive use of tech­nol­ogy to track and dis­trib­ute prod­ucts Wal­ton trans­formed the rela­tion­ship between mer­chant and ven­dor. He cre­ated his own dis­tri­b­u­tion cen­ters and net­work and he pio­neered a bar­code sys­tem to keep track of every piece of mer­chan­dise. After 1987 Wal-Mart’s com­mu­ni­ca­tion was fur­ther aided by the world’s largest pri­vate, inte­grated satel­lite com­mu­ni­ca­tion net­work. This was noth­ing less than a “logis­tics rev­o­lu­tion” Licht­en­stein tells us, and it allowed Wal-Mart to put the squeeze on its man­u­fac­tur­ers and sup­pli­ers, employ­ing this wealth of new data to “lever­age their enor­mous buy­ing power.” This abil­ity to pres­sure man­u­fac­tur­ers and sup­pli­ers was one of the major rea­sons the com­pany could offer such low prices and it remains Wal-Mart’s major advan­tage in the global marketplace.

Hav­ing clearly estab­lished the logis­ti­cal inno­va­tions that aided Wal-Mart’s growth, Lichtenstein’s chap­ter focus­ing on the role of China comes across bril­liantly. Ini­tially attrac­tive to Wal-Mart because of its “sta­ble cur­rency, devel­oped infra­struc­ture, polit­i­cal reli­a­bil­ity, and com­pli­ant work­force,” China is now cru­cial to Wal-Mart’s con­tin­ued suc­cess. But Wal-Mart’s inno­v­a­tive meth­ods to pinch pro­duc­ers and sup­pli­ers have cre­ated a night­mare for work­ers and labor stan­dards in China. As the author explains, “an excru­ci­at­ing squeeze on all of its [Chi­nese] sup­pli­ers” has pro­duced “a cas­cade of social patholo­gies that cor­rupt and dis­tort every sup­ply chain rela­tion­ship: between the prime Wal-Mart ven­dor and its sub­con­trac­tors, between fac­tory inspec­tors and fac­tory man­age­ment, and between the pro­duc­tion super­vi­sors and the young female work­ers who com­pose the over­whelm­ing bulk of the fac­tory work­force.” So, dur­ing high-production sea­son in China’s Guang­dong Province, sub­con­trac­tors pro­duc­ing Wal-Mart goods reg­u­larly require “seven-day work­weeks and eighteen-hour work­days.” Licht­en­stein makes crys­tal clear the hor­ri­fy­ing image of a “vast new uni­verse of sweat­shops that fill the pro­duc­tion end of the Wal-Mart sup­ply chain.”

Although highly orig­i­nal infor­ma­tion is packed into every chap­ter of The Retail Rev­o­lu­tion, more famil­iar to observers of Wal-Mart will be Lichtenstein’s chap­ters on the company’s con­ser­v­a­tive and male-dominated cor­po­rate cul­ture, its ties to right-wing polit­i­cal and reli­gious move­ments, and its unabashed and unwa­ver­ing attempts to keep out labor unions. Those keep­ing track of Wal-Mart in the news will also be famil­iar with the sto­ries Licht­en­stein tells of the union and com­mu­nity groups’ chal­lenges to its expan­sion into South­ern Cal­i­for­nia, Chicago, and Maryland.

How­ever, Licht­en­stein cap­ti­vates the reader by plac­ing these well-told sto­ries along­side Wal-Mart’s attempts to expand inter­na­tion­ally. Accord­ing to Licht­en­stein, while the com­pany has been enthu­si­as­ti­cally embraced in many parts of Latin Amer­ica and East Asia, Wal-Mart has run into road­blocks “in nations where either pol­i­tics or a tough reg­u­la­tory envi­ron­ment robs the com­pany of the capac­ity to slash labor costs or build a new gen­er­a­tion of sub­ur­ban stores.” In the United King­dom, for exam­ple, Wal-Mart has had con­sid­er­able trou­ble while in Ger­many, where the com­pany failed to grasp the sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ences in polit­i­cal cul­ture, it has expe­ri­enced “out­right failure.”

Licht­en­stein con­cludes The Retail Rev­o­lu­tion by ask­ing the reader to con­sider the future for Wal-Mart and what an oppo­si­tion move­ment might be able to yield. Licht­en­stein sug­gests that the decline of the labor move­ment and Wal-Mart’s hos­til­ity to union­ism “has reawak­ened inter­est in what pro­gres­sives and New Deal­ers used to call ‘the labor ques­tion.’” “On the agenda” for pro­gres­sives and labor activists today “is not so much a strug­gle specif­i­cally against Wal-Mart, although that is well under way. In the end, it is Sam’s World, the one in which peo­ple are com­pelled to live under eco­nomic and psy­cho­log­i­cal duress, that needs to change.” Licht­en­stein pre­dicts “a day of reck­on­ing” for Wal-Mart, at home and abroad.

Bethany More­ton adopts a dif­fer­ent approach to Wal-Mart that focuses instead on the region and the peo­ple that pro­duced the com­pany. Although To Serve God and Wal-Mart: The Mak­ing of Chris­t­ian Free Enter­prise makes a sig­nif­i­cant con­tri­bu­tion to our under­stand­ing of the com­pany, More­ton aims to do even more. She seeks to reclaim the peo­ple of Wal-Mart coun­try from his­tor­i­cal and polit­i­cal irrel­e­vancy. More­ton makes a case for plac­ing these peo­ple, espe­cially Wal-Mart Moms (the white, rural women who worked and shopped in the early Wal-Mart stores) at the cen­ter of the polit­i­cal and eco­nomic changes in the last three decades of Amer­i­can history.

In a sur­pris­ing and inter­est­ing argu­ment, More­ton claims that the peo­ple of Arkansas, the orig­i­nal Wal-Mart coun­try, held tightly to their 19th cen­tury pop­ulism, and that this polit­i­cal and cul­tural legacy actu­ally helped facil­i­tate the rise of Wal-Mart from the pop­ulist heart­land. This shouldn’t be so sur­pris­ing, More­ton argues, if we rec­og­nize that pop­ulists “were not purely hos­tile to busi­ness or big­ness.” They pro­posed farm­ers’ coop­er­a­tives and producer’s monop­o­lies over the farm­ing sec­tor, improved infra­struc­ture, and they favored the idea of “fed­eral resources for a favored seg­ment of the polity, the vir­tu­ous farm­ers.” Thus, More­ton argues, the “frag­mented legacy of Pop­ulism” facil­i­tated the rise of “the mega-corporations of the Sun Belt.” Demands for the state to under­write regional devel­op­ment and con­cern about keep­ing resources local all “con­tributed to Wal-Mart’s sub­se­quent suc­cess” and “helped the world’s largest com­pany win hearts and minds to the cause of cor­po­rate cap­i­tal­ism in the old heart­land of anti-corporate agitation.”

Other val­ues that work­ers and cus­tomers from Wal-Mart coun­try brought into the stores were even more deci­sive. As the author puts it, these peo­ple, espe­cially middle-aged moth­ers, “brought rural, Protes­tant fam­ily ideals into the work­place, chang­ing the face of postin­dus­trial Amer­ica.” Although author­ity in Wal-Mart stores was clearly vested in men “as men, not as man­age­ment,” and all women were there­fore sub­or­di­nate, More­ton main­tains that Wal-Mart women still had a good deal of power. They “made their pri­or­i­ties known, and man­age­ment responded accord­ingly,” thereby being the source of “the orig­i­nal momen­tum” for “a new ser­vice ethos” which would “grow to an eco­nomic gospel.” Through the “rela­tion­ship between cus­tomers and clerks, the peo­ple in early Wal-Mart stores taught man­age­ment how to func­tion in the new eco­nomic niche it was cre­at­ing.” This was the “ethos of ser­vice … a new ide­o­log­i­cal basis for valu­ing work and for explain­ing the rad­i­cal inequal­i­ties it produced.”

More­ton intends this argu­ment to be a response to jour­nal­ists and schol­ars like Thomas Frank who fail to fully under­stand what hap­pened in Wal-Mart coun­try. The women and men of Wal-Mart were not duped into plac­ing social and reli­gious con­cerns before eco­nomic needs, nor were they sim­ply exploited work­ers who were too stu­pid to real­ize it. Accord­ing to More­ton, Wal-Mart shop­pers and work­ers helped shape a com­pany and a work­place that met their needs as well as those of Wal-Mart own­ers and man­age­ment. Women work­ers at Wal-Mart “did not auto­mat­i­cally claim the iden­tity of ‘worker’ or, indeed, of ‘woman.’ Their own pref­er­ence was for a dif­fer­ent cul­tural tra­di­tion, that of Chris­t­ian ser­vice,” More­ton claims. So, even though the ser­vant model that Wal-Mart moms helped pro­mote offered man­age­ment a new claim to author­ity and even though it solid­i­fied patri­archy in the work­place as well as the home, it also offered female ser­vice work­ers a new source of respect and it ensured greater par­tic­i­pa­tion by hus­bands at home. This was, accord­ing to More­ton, an accept­able com­pro­mise for Wal-Mart women.

In addi­tion, To Serve God and Wal-Mart tells the story of the simul­ta­ne­ous rise of the New Chris­t­ian Right, ascen­dancy of free-market ideas, and growth of Wal-Mart as an inter­na­tional cor­po­ra­tion. Find­ing many points of inter­sec­tion between these three sto­ries, More­ton argues that Wal-Mart coun­try became, through the direct sup­port of Wal-Mart, Inc., the home of Chris­t­ian free enter­prise, a move­ment that fused reli­gious and eco­nomic ideas to evan­ge­lize for free mar­ket capitalism.

In the early-1970s, the United States was expe­ri­enc­ing the polit­i­cal and eco­nomic tremors that would cause the New Deal state and New Deal lib­er­al­ism to col­lapse. Wal-Mart and the peo­ple of Wal-Mart coun­try played an impor­tant part in this process, More­ton observes. Con­tribut­ing to the grow­ing “pres­tige of the mar­ket,” Wal-Mart and the Wal­ton fam­ily pro­vided “a highly pro­duc­tive lab­o­ra­tory of free-market faith dur­ing the 1970s and 1980s.” By intro­duc­ing a free mar­ket edu­ca­tional cam­paign among its man­age­ment as well is in regional Chris­t­ian col­leges, Wal-Mart helped plant the seeds that would grow into the neolib­eral “Wash­ing­ton con­sen­sus.” Wal-Mart became the main bene­fac­tor of con­ser­v­a­tive Chris­t­ian col­leges like Uni­ver­sity of the Ozarks, John Brown Uni­ver­sity and Hard­ing Uni­ver­sity, giv­ing them key finan­cial sup­port when other sources of fund­ing were hard to come by. In return, regional Chris­t­ian col­leges moved eco­nom­ics courses and busi­ness depart­ments to the cen­ter of the cur­ricu­lum, pro­mot­ing a wide­spread regional embrace of free mar­ket ideas and cre­at­ing ready avenues for future com­pany man­age­ment. Housed at South­west Bap­tist Uni­ver­sity in Boli­var, Mis­souri, Stu­dents in Free Enter­prise, an extracur­ric­u­lar orga­ni­za­tion that pro­moted free enter­prise ideas among col­lege stu­dents, rep­re­sented an excep­tion­ally “out­stand­ing lab­o­ra­tory for the elab­o­ra­tion and dis­sem­i­na­tion” of these ideas. In all these ways, More­ton shows, Wal-Mart coun­try was espe­cially fer­tile ground for the seeds of Chris­t­ian free enter­prise to take root.

The ide­ol­ogy of Chris­t­ian free enter­prise that grew out the care­ful col­lab­o­ra­tion between Wal-Mart and con­ser­v­a­tive Chris­t­ian col­leges had an impor­tant impact on the course of eco­nomic glob­al­iza­tion, par­tic­u­larly as it would affect Latin Amer­ica. More­ton demon­strates how this move­ment tapped into an evan­ge­liz­ing spirit that extended south of the bor­der to Mex­ico and Cen­tral Amer­ica. Offered Wal­ton Schol­ar­ships, Latin Amer­i­can stu­dents came to Sun Belt Chris­t­ian col­leges to receive train­ing in the virtues of free mar­ket cap­i­tal­ism as well as evan­gel­i­cal Chris­tian­ity. When they returned to their home coun­tries, these Wal­ton Schol­ars could be depended upon to help estab­lish inter­na­tional branches or at least spread the gospel of free enterprise.

To Serve God and Wal-Mart is a fas­ci­nat­ing and use­ful work of US cul­tural and eco­nomic his­tory. More­ton adds much to our under­stand­ing of the peo­ple of Wal-Mart coun­try leav­ing the reader with a bet­ter idea of the com­plex­ity of this group. Even as it answers cer­tain ques­tions, how­ever, Moreton’s work raises oth­ers. In her attempt to under­stand the agency of Wal-Mart employ­ees, More­ton eclipses work­place con­cerns these labor­ers must have had, and she fails to fully engage with them as work­ers, an iden­tity that likely per­sisted even if in a sub­or­di­nate posi­tion along­side the iden­tity of Chris­t­ian ser­vant and woman. Nel­son Licht­en­stein acknowl­edges the wide­spread devo­tion to Wal-Mart that many of its work­ers had, but he also details the many com­plaints that these same work­ers put forth. Where is the anger over being forced to do unpaid work or the anx­i­ety that unusual work hours and lim­ited ben­e­fits pro­duced in the work­force? Are we to assume that this was com­pletely erased by work­ers’ devo­tion to Chris­t­ian ser­vant­hood? Even in the ear­li­est Wal-Mart work­ers this seems unlikely.

Another set of ques­tions arises around the ide­ol­ogy of Chris­t­ian free enter­prise that occu­pies such an impor­tant part of Moreton’s story. As More­ton explained the for­ma­tion and influ­ence of Chris­t­ian free enter­prise I fre­quently found myself won­der­ing what dif­fer­en­ti­ated this sort of ide­ol­ogy from main­stream mar­ket fun­da­men­tal­ism. What made it “Chris­t­ian” free enter­prise? More­ton does show how South­west Bap­tist Uni­ver­sity, the home of Stu­dents in Free Enter­prise, fused Chris­t­ian and busi­ness edu­ca­tion and she clearly demon­strates that free mar­ket fun­da­men­tal­ists part­nered with Chris­t­ian fun­da­men­tal­ists to build a pow­er­ful move­ment. Still, what is miss­ing is a care­ful dis­cus­sion of the exchange between eco­nomic ide­ol­ogy and evan­gel­i­cal the­ol­ogy, with­out which Chris­t­ian free enter­prise is left look­ing vir­tu­ally iden­ti­cal to other forms of free mar­ket fundamentalism.

These con­cerns aside, Bethany More­ton has writ­ten an extremely inter­est­ing book. Along­side Nel­son Lichtenstein’s The Retail Rev­o­lu­tion, To Serve God and Wal-Mart adds a great deal to our under­stand­ing of US his­tory and the con­tem­po­rary world. These books should put to rest any ques­tion about the rel­e­vance of Wal-Mart and the sig­nif­i­cance of polit­i­cal and cul­tural move­ments pro­duced in Wal-Mart country.

Posted by Carl Lindskoog on Nov 27th, 2009 and filed under Book Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

You must be logged in to post a comment Login