• News
  • CUNY News In Brief
• Reviews
  • Art Reviews
  • Book Reviews
  • Music Reviews
  • Theatre Reviews
  • Film Reviews
  • Photos
  • Books that Changed the Way we Think
• Adjuncting
• The Back Page
• Grad. Life
• Political Analysis
• Health Issues
• DSC Page
• Dispatches from the Front
• Features
  • Recent Features
• Opinion
  • Editor's Desk
  • From The Editor's Desk
• Ask Harriet
• columns
• Announcements
• Attention New Students
• Student Forum
• Grad Student Astrology

The GC Advocate Guide to the 2009 NYC Mayoral Elections

by Advocate Staff

Let’s face it. The pick­ings in this year’s may­oral race are pretty slim. Bloomberg has out­spent every other can­di­date in the field by a good $60 mil­lion, and the Democ­rats have hardly put their best foot for­ward by nom­i­nat­ing the lack­lus­ter under­dog Bill Thomp­son. Mean­while, the Greens have cho­sen a celebrity can­di­date who may or not actu­ally want to be mayor, while most of the other voices in the fray are either slightly wacko, inex­pe­ri­enced, or com­pletely invis­i­ble to most voters.

Although their can­di­date Jimmy McMil­lan has no real chance of win­ning, at the end of the day The Rent is Too Damn High Party might actu­ally be the best vote this year since it would at least send a mes­sage to both Bloomberg and Thomp­son, the Democ­rats and the Repub­li­cans, that some­thing rad­i­cal must indeed be done about the cost of liv­ing in NYC. Despite all of this, or per­haps because of it, the GC Advo­cate offers you this guide, some­what tongue in cheek, to the 2009 can­di­dates for the mayor of New York City.

Cur­rent Mayor — Michael Bloomberg:

Mayor of New York from 2002 to the present, Bloomberg is the multi-billionaire (cur­rently ranked sev­en­teen among the world’s wealth­i­est bil­lion­aires) owner of Bloomberg LP — an infor­ma­tion, news, and media com­pany that pro­vides infor­ma­tion ser­vices to invest­ment firms such as Mer­rill Lynch. Bloomberg also owns a sub­stan­tial radio net­work whose flag­ship sta­tion, WBBR reaches thou­sands of New York­ers every day. His great wealth has made it easy for him to abstain from the stan­dard may­oral salary and accepts just $1 a year for his services.

The Good:

Although his crit­ics say his poli­cies have con­tributed to gen­tri­fi­ca­tion, out of con­trol rents, and the loss of neigh­bor­hood cul­ture, many would argue that the mayor has made the city a much more pleas­ant and arguably safer and much health­ier place to live (if you can afford it).

GUN CONTROL: The mayor has been a staunch advo­cate of gun con­trol ever since his elec­tion in 2002, recently fund­ing a highly reported pri­vate inves­ti­ga­tion of out of state gun shows (where guns are often sold with­out back­ground checks or wait­ing peri­ods). Bloomberg blames the ille­gal prac­tices uncov­ered at these shows for con­tribut­ing to gun vio­lence in the city, and has argued that such shows should be out­lawed. Bloomberg is also the co-founder of “May­ors against Ille­gal Guns,” an orga­ni­za­tion of city may­ors ded­i­cated to the elim­i­na­tion of ille­gal gun sales. Although some spec­u­late the Mayor’s recent inves­ti­ga­tion was a polit­i­cal stunt designed pre­cisely to influ­ence lib­eral vot­ers, other can­di­dates would nonethe­less do well to take up the man­tle of gun con­trol advo­cacy the way that Bloomberg has.

ENVIRONMENT: As those who like to bike to the Grad­u­ate Cen­ter already know, the mayor has been as active as any pre­vi­ous mayor in mak­ing New York City a safe city for bicy­cle com­muters as well as a much safer and more pleas­ant place for pedes­tri­ans. Under Bloomberg, who is a large con­trib­u­tor to the Cen­tral Park Con­ser­vancy, the city has cre­ated more green spaces, more pedes­trian malls (includ­ing sev­eral pedes­trian malls on Broad­way), and more ded­i­cated bike lanes than any mayor in recent his­tory. Bloomberg plans to con­tinue to cre­ate as much as fifty miles of new bike lanes every year. Bloomberg was also the man respon­si­ble for out­law­ing smok­ing in New York City bars and restau­rants and imple­ment­ing a ban on the use of trans fats in New York City Restau­rants (both of which, unless you’re a smoker or really like Krispy Kreme, are good things in the end).

311: Say what you will about Bloomberg’s meth­ods or his empha­sis on employ­ing tac­tics and pro­ce­dures from the pri­vate sec­tor, but the cre­ation of the offi­cial 311 city infor­ma­tion line was a thought­ful and con­struc­tive way to help city res­i­dents find help and answers to press­ing needs and ques­tions about city ser­vices. In addi­tion, 311 has helped res­i­dents become more directly involved in report­ing upon issues such as unsafe work­ing con­di­tions, graf­fiti, garbage dump­ing, and other low level city nuisances.

The Bad:

Fol­low­ing Giuliani’s lead, Bloomberg seems more con­cerned with mak­ing New York a thriv­ing inter­na­tional metrop­o­lis than an eco­nom­i­cally sus­tain­able, liv­able, and afford­able city. In the process the mayor has pri­or­i­tized cor­po­rate inter­ests, gen­tri­fi­ca­tion, and devel­op­ment over job cre­ation and housing.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Although the New York Times reported that Bloomberg increased afford­able hous­ing units by 165,000 between 2002 – 2007, under his lead­er­ship — and in part because of his pro-market poli­cies — the city lost more than 200,000 low income hous­ing units dur­ing that same period, for a net loss of 35,000 units. This loss is in large part due to the mayor’s priv­i­leg­ing of pri­vate inter­ests over the pub­lic good and his intense gen­tri­fi­ca­tion and devel­op­ment efforts, which have resulted in the con­ver­sion of sev­eral for­merly rent sta­bi­lized com­mu­ni­ties, such as Stuyvesant Town, into lux­ury condominiums.

GOOD JOBS: In his 2009 state of the city address, Bloomberg noted that he had cre­ated 227,000 more jobs from 2002 – 2009. But it turns out that most of those new jobs will be in the grow­ing but low pay­ing dead end ser­vice sec­tor. The New York Times reports that New York City lost 43 per­cent of its man­u­fac­tur­ing jobs under Bloomberg from Jan­u­ary 2002 to August 2009. “In 2008, these jobs paid on aver­age $52,758 a year.” As the city increas­ingly gen­tri­fies, there will surely be a greater call for wait­ers, bar­tenders, baris­tas, sales­per­sons, cashiers, and pedi­curists, but few of these jobs actu­ally pro­vide a wage con­sis­tent with the cost of liv­ing in NYC, and most pro­vide very lim­ited ben­e­fits, if any.

The Ugly:

Bloomberg may want to be Mayor for life.

THIRD TERM SCANDAL: Despite his reas­sur­ances at the recent may­oral debate (from which all can­di­dates but Bill Thomp­son were barred) that he would not seek another term after his third, Bloomberg has had a hard time allay­ing fears that he’s play­ing out some regal fan­tasy where he has been anointed King of New York. Locals aren’t con­cerned yet about a fourth term; they’re still fum­ing about the way in which Bloomberg rewrote the law to allow him to run for reelec­tion this time around. When for­mer mayor Rudolph Giu­liani tested the same waters in 2001 to accom­plish the sim­i­lar ends, Bloomberg labeled the idea of extend­ing term lim­its a “dis­grace.” Yet in the after­math of the finan­cial cri­sis, Bloomberg expe­ri­enced a change of heart, appar­ently moti­vated by the belief that he alone could save the city from finan­cial dis­as­ter. His hench­men in the city coun­cil appar­ently agreed, and in a sin­gle act of munic­i­pal dis­grace voted to over­ride two pub­lic ref­er­en­dums where vot­ers clearly expressed their oppo­si­tion to term limit exten­sions. Since then, the mayor has poured tens of mil­lions into a cam­paign where he faces no seri­ous chal­lenge, increas­ing spec­u­la­tion fur­ther that Mayor Mike is more con­cerned about his legacy than hon­or­ing the basic prin­ci­ples of local democracy.

Demo­c­ra­tic Party — Bill Thompson:

Bill Thomp­son has served as both the pres­i­dent of the New York City Board of Edu­ca­tion from 1996 to 2001 as well as the New York City comp­trol­ler from 2002 until the present. Thomp­son defeated his pri­mary oppo­nent Tony Avella in a land­slide vic­tory to win the Demo­c­ra­tic Party nom­i­na­tion for mayor in Sep­tem­ber. Thomp­son is run­ning as a Demo­c­rat but also has the back­ing of the Work­ing Fam­i­lies Party.

The Good:

As comp­trol­ler, it is Thompson’s job to over­see the use of the city’s finances, and on that count Thomp­son appears to have done a good job defend­ing the city’s funds against the cor­rup­tion and graft of pri­vate interests.

EDUCATION: As city comp­trol­ler, Thomp­son exposed sev­eral endemic prob­lems at the board of edu­ca­tion includ­ing an audit of the no-bid con­trac­tors Alvarez and Mar­shall, which exposed exces­sive over­charg­ing to the city. Thomp­son has also pro­posed, if elected, to fire schools chan­cel­lor Joel Klein, and to end the pri­va­ti­za­tion of NYC’s pub­lic schools.

LABOR: Thomp­son also inves­ti­gated sev­eral labor abuses, includ­ing an inves­ti­ga­tion which led to a $750,000 set­tle­ment against JC Man­del Secu­rity who had been under­pay­ing their employ­ees. Accord­ing to his own cam­paign state­ments, Thomp­son claims to have “ini­ti­ated more cases and penal­ized more con­trac­tors than any comp­trol­ler before. Thomp­son also has the endorse­ments of sev­eral labor unions, includ­ing the Trans­porta­tion Work­ers Union local, which Thomp­son has vocally sup­ported. This endorse­ment, how­ever, may have as much to do with the union’s anger at Bloomberg’s crit­i­cism as it does with Thompson’s poten­tial as mayor.

The Bad:

Thomp­son has been char­ac­ter­ized as a career machine party politi­cian, and while he has been a staunch defender of the city’s cof­fers, he has not always been as good at mak­ing them grow as much as they should.

POOR MANAGEMENT: Per­haps the biggest crit­i­cism of Thompson’s per­for­mance as comp­trol­ler is the repeated claim that he mis­man­aged the New York City Employ­ees’ Retire­ment Sys­tem, which, over the last seven years has per­formed in the bot­tom third among sim­i­lar large pen­sion funds. All of this hap­pened even asThomp­son was receiv­ing large cam­paign con­tri­bu­tions from sev­eral of the fund’s money man­agers. “In some cases,” reported the New York Times, “the exec­u­tives gave to Mr. Thomp­son just months before the pen­sion funds hired them to man­age tens of mil­lions of dol­lars, accord­ing to inter­views and pub­lic records.”

BIKE LANES: Thomp­son seems to be ambiva­lent about the idea of fur­ther increases in bike lanes and pedes­trian plazas. In a debate with Tony Avella, Thomp­son said: “I favor bicy­cle lanes; how­ever, you are hear­ing the com­plaint all over the city of New York, because the com­mu­ni­ties have not been con­sulted. They’ve been ignored. Bicy­cle lanes have been dropped upon them and there has been no dis­cus­sion. That’s wrong and that shouldn’t con­tinue.” Thomp­son also told a group of Chi­na­town res­i­dents that were he elected he would tear up the ded­i­cated bike lane on Grand Street.

The Ugly:

Even with Obama’s “endorse­ment,” Thomp­son doesn’t stand a chance against Bloomberg’s $65 mil­lion campaign.

OBAMA OBSESSED: Thomp­son has shame­lessly attempted to ride the coat­tails of Barack Obama’s pop­u­lar­ity by insist­ing that he had received the president’s bless­ing and sup­port in the may­oral race. In fact, Obama has never spo­ken pub­licly on the issue, but his spokesper­son said that the pres­i­dent sup­ports can­di­dates in the Demo­c­ra­tic Party. He refused, after being pressed, to pro­nounce Bill Thompson’s name. Thomp­son, though, took it as noth­ing less than a ring­ing endorse­ment, issu­ing a press release stat­ing: “Yes we can in New York: Barack Obama sup­ports Bill Thomp­son for mayor.”

Green Party — Rev­erend Billy Talen:

Rev­erend Billy (a.k.a. Billy Talen) is a vet­eran polit­i­cal activist and per­former and is the charis­matic and irrev­er­ent leader of the Church of Life After Shop­ping, which preaches an anti-consumer gospel based on a gift econ­omy of love and com­mu­nity. Talen announced his bid for mayor at a Union Square rally in March of this year.

The Good:

Talen’s plat­form, though not ter­ri­bly detailed, focuses on the cre­ation and rein­vig­o­ra­tion of greater com­mu­nity space and a greater empha­sis on local neigh­bor­hood control.

LOCAL CULTURE: Like a twenty-first cen­tury Jane Jacobs, Rev­erend Billy sup­ports the pro­mo­tion of local cul­ture against what he calls the “devel­oper inva­sion” and “upzon­ing” tak­ing place in New York City today. Were he to be elected Rev­erend Billy vows that “all new devel­op­ments must be community-driven and community-approved.” Talen also sup­ports pro­vid­ing incen­tives for the cre­ation and pro­mo­tion of locally-owned small busi­nesses, which he argues help to keep money within the local economies and to cre­ate a sense of place and com­mu­nity. One inter­est­ing plan to improve local con­trol laid out in Talen’s plat­form would be to “dis­en­gage Com­mu­nity Boards from the appointive pow­ers of Bor­ough Pres­i­dents. In Brook­lyn we have seen sum­mary purges from Com­mu­nity Boards by Marty Markowitz, usu­ally of peo­ple who didn’t sup­port his posi­tion on the Atlantic Yards and For­est City Ratner.”

GREEN PARTY: Talen is run­ning on the Green Party ticket and all votes for Talen are a vote for the con­tin­ued rel­e­vance and power of the greater Green Party.

The Bad:

Rev­erend Billy is a sea­soned activist but not a politician.

THEATRE OR POLITICS?: While Talen’s cam­paign and party affil­i­a­tion make him appear like a seri­ous, even legit­i­mately viable can­di­date for the office, it is hard to know how will­ing Talen would be to really set aside his Rev­erend Billy per­sona and get down to the seri­ous busi­ness of run­ning the largest city in the United States.

The Ugly:

His hair.

Con­ser­v­a­tive Party — Stephen Christopher:

Christo­pher is the Pas­tor of the Memo­r­ial Bap­tist Church in Brook­lyn. He also ran unsuc­cess­fully for the New York State Sen­ate in 2008.

The Good:

Sup­ports restric­tions on use of emi­nent domain.

The Bad:

He’s a con­ser­v­a­tive, and his bid for mayor is prob­a­bly noth­ing more than an attempt to keep his name alive in the Con­ser­v­a­tive Party and among con­ser­v­a­tive cir­cles.

The Ugly:

His plat­form is ret­ro­gres­sive and dan­ger­ous. Christo­pher and the con­ser­v­a­tives are pri­mar­ily con­cerned with issues of tax­a­tion, but he also advo­cates for a fully pri­va­tized health insur­ance sys­tem, wants to restore the death penalty, pro­hibit stem cell research, roll back abor­tion rights, not rec­og­nize trans­gen­der peo­ples as spe­cial cat­e­gories of human beings in human rights law, etc. etc. etc.

Social­ism and Lib­er­a­tion Party — Frances Villar:

One of City University’s very own, Frances Vil­lar has been a pres­ence on the activist scene in New York City since 2006. The Dominican-born Vil­lar is a stu­dent at Lehman Col­lege where she helped orga­nize stu­dents to sup­port the Jena Six, and to resist tuition increases in 2008. The 26-year-old Vil­lar is run­ning as mayor for the newly formed Social­ism and Lib­er­a­tion Party whose plat­form advo­cates an explic­itly rev­o­lu­tion­ary politics.

The Good:

She’s a social­ist; she has a pretty rad­i­cal platform

The Bad:

No real plan for how to imple­ment change. Like many rev­o­lu­tion­ary par­ties, the SLP empha­sizes rev­o­lu­tion at the expense of actual change with all prob­lems traced back to the cap­i­tal­ist sys­tem. Because of this, Villar’s plat­form is filled with com­plaint but almost devoid of any solu­tions to the prob­lems out­side of over­throw­ing the cap­i­tal­ist system.

The Ugly:

party, the SLP, is the off­spring of a split from the Worker’s World Party and is a largely a sec­tar­ian organization.

Social­ist Worker Party — Dan Fein:

Dan Fein is a 64-year-old sewing machine operator. Villar’s

The Good:

He’s a social­ist, and we’re not talk­ing about the Obama vari­ety of socialism.

A MAN OF THE PEOPLE: As a mem­ber of the Social­ist Worker’s Party, Fein’s plat­form includes guar­an­teed unem­ploy­ment com­pen­sa­tion at union scale, an increase in the min­i­mum wage to union scale, and an end to all income taxes on workers.

The Bad:

He’s a social­ist: too much in the way of tired rhetoric, not much in the way of clear pri­or­i­ties for a bet­ter New York.

The Ugly:

Has not both­ered to limit his agenda to issues actu­ally hav­ing to do with New York City pol­i­tics. Issues of national pol­i­tics and the Iraq and Afghan wars is a higher pri­or­ity, for exam­ple, than nuts and bolts solu­tions to issues directly affect­ing New York work­ing class folks.

Rent is Too Damn High Can­di­date — Jimmy McMillan:

What can you say about Jimmy McMillan’s plat­form that you can’t put into five sim­ple words: “Rent is too damn high!” McMil­lan, who is a retired postal worker and a Viet­nam vet, has been a peren­nial can­di­date for mayor and has been run­ning on this same plat­form since at least 1993, when he was arrested for scal­ing one of the cables on the Brook­lyn Bridge with a “Rambo knife” demand­ing that a tele­vi­sion crew be brought to broad­cast his message.

The Good:

McMil­lan is offi­cially on the bal­lot this time around.

The Bad:

“Rent is too damn high.”

The Ugly:

“Rent is too damn high.”

Share on Facebook

Posted by Advocate Staff on Oct 21st, 2009 and filed under Features. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

Click to download a pdf of the latest issue!