Grab our RSS Feed

And the Beat Goes on… and on, and on…

by Naomi Perley


Beat Furrer_BW

Works by Beat Fur­rer, Bern­hard Lang, and Steve Reich at Mov­ing Sounds 2009

Last month, the Aus­trian Cul­tural Forum, the Argento New Music Project, the Music Infor­ma­tion Cen­ter Aus­tria (MICA), and Le Pois­son Rouge jointly pre­sented Mov­ing Sounds 2009, a fes­ti­val “devoted to sound and its roles in con­tem­po­rary music.” The three-day fes­ti­val, which sought to bring together artists work­ing with sound across dif­fer­ent media and gen­res, fea­tured sev­eral con­certs of works by “clas­si­cal” com­posers as well as by DJs, an art instal­la­tion at the Aus­trian Cul­tural Forum, panel dis­cus­sions, and par­ties. In order to get a taste of the fes­ti­val, I attended con­certs on Sep­tem­ber 12 and 13 and one of the pan­els on the after­noon of September13.

The cura­tors, Michel Galante and Peter Rantasa, sought to bring together like-minded artists from the United States and Aus­tria. The con­certs on Sep­tem­ber 12 fea­tured works by Aus­trian com­posers Beat Fur­rer and Bern­hard Lang, and fin­ished with a per­for­mance of Steve Reich’s sem­i­nal Music for Eigh­teen Musi­cians.

Beat Furrer’s Xenos II, for nar­ra­tor and a twenty-person cham­ber ensem­ble, addressed through the medium of music sev­eral of the hot top­ics of the fes­ti­val. The basis of the work was Furrer’s own voice: the instru­men­tal parts are a musi­cal tran­scrip­tion of Fur­rer speak­ing. At the sym­po­sium the next day, the com­posers spoke at length about the chal­lenges of tran­scrib­ing non-musical sounds for musi­cal instru­ments, and the dif­fi­cul­ties of notat­ing and con­vey­ing to per­form­ers the types of sounds they wished to hear. Fur­rer cited I Am Sit­ting in a Room, by Amer­i­can com­poser Alvin Lucier, as an exam­ple of what he was aim­ing for in his own works. In I Am Sit­ting in a Room, the com­poser first recorded him­self read­ing a text. He then played it in a room, record­ing it onto a sec­ond tape as it played. He then played the record­ing of the record­ing, pro­duc­ing a third record­ing. With each sub­se­quent record­ing, the voice becomes less clear and the res­o­nances of the room itself become the dom­i­nant sound.

In the first move­ment of Xenos II, Fur­rer read a sin­gle word, which was then musi­cally refracted by the cham­ber ensem­ble, in the form of a soft chord. The sparse, light tex­ture and the sta­tic calm of alter­nat­ing words and chords evoked the restrained, min­i­mal style of Hun­gar­ian com­poser Gyorgy Kurtag. The open­ing of the sec­ond move­ment imme­di­ately jolted the audi­ence out of this Zen-like atmos­phere, begin­ning with a series of alarm­ingly loud, dis­so­nant chords in the wood­winds and brass. This text­less move­ment was in every way the oppo­site of the first, with con­stantly shift­ing reg­is­ters, tim­bres, and dynamics.

In Differenz/Wiederholung 2 (the title is Ger­man for Difference/Repetition), Bern­hard Lang also explores the human voice, albeit from a dif­fer­ent angle. It is writ­ten for three vocal­ists — includ­ing a Kur­dish singer and a rap­per — and a cham­ber ensem­ble of approx­i­mately ten musi­cians. Lang used texts by the philoso­pher Gilles Deleuze (the work is named after his Dif­fer­ence and Rep­e­ti­tion) and writ­ers William Bur­roughs and Chris­t­ian Loidl. He sought to cre­ate a coun­ter­point between dif­fer­ent styles of singing, between impro­vised and com­posed music, and between spo­ken nar­ra­tion and song.

In addi­tion to these dichotomies, the work also explores the pos­si­bil­i­ties of rep­e­ti­tion. Lang, in addi­tion to being a classically-trained com­poser, has been heav­ily influ­enced by turntab­lism and DJ cul­ture, and the effects of this aes­thetic came to the fore­front in this work. The vocal­ists often get “stuck” on a word or syl­la­ble, mim­ic­k­ing with their voices the effect of a DJ loop­ing a sound over and over. The aes­thetic of rep­e­ti­tion car­ries over into the instru­men­tal­ists’ parts as well. Vio­lin­ist Miranda Cuck­son and elec­tric gui­tarist Oren Fader built some thor­oughly enjoy­able impro­vi­sa­tions out of small, sim­ple motives through­out the piece, which lent the whole work a sense of unity and dra­matic force.

While Saturday’s con­cert focused on the voice, in var­i­ous forms, Sunday’s looked at quite a dif­fer­ent aspect of sound. It fea­tured works for per­cus­sion and elec­tron­ics, per­formed by TimeTable Per­cus­sion Trio and DJ Christo­pher Just. In addi­tion to works by Bern­hard Lang and Beat Fur­rer, the trio per­formed works by New York com­posers Sam Pluta and Eliz­a­beth Hoffman.

First up was a mul­ti­me­dia work by Sam Pluta, a young com­poser study­ing at Colum­bia. In addi­tion to some per­cus­sion instru­ments and elec­tron­ics, there were two TV screens hooked up to the elec­tronic equip­ment. As the per­form­ers made dif­fer­ent sounds with the elec­tron­ics, stripes would flash across the TV screen with vary­ing inten­sity. While the work had a com­pletely dif­fer­ent tex­ture from those of the other night, dom­i­nated by elec­tronic sounds, some of the same com­po­si­tional ideas were clearly at play, with a focus on rep­e­ti­tion and con­sis­tent texture.

The old­est work on Sun­day evening’s con­cert was Beat Furrer’s Music for Mal­lets, com­posed in 1985. In this work, each of the three per­cus­sion­ists played a dif­fer­ent mal­let instru­ment: the xylorimba, the marimba, and the vibra­phone. The work was in a way an etude in com­pos­ing for a lim­ited tim­bre, and at the same time fit with the gen­eral trend in this fes­ti­val towards an explo­ration of rep­e­ti­tion and min­i­mal­ism beyond the style of Steve Reich and Philip Glass.

In a fit­ting twist, Furrer’s work was rein­vented later on the pro­gram by DJ Christo­pher Just, who per­formed a live mix based on Music for Mal­lets. This per­for­mance was one of the high­lights of the fes­ti­val. Just com­bined many dif­fer­ent styles of music, clas­si­cal and pop­u­lar, in his mix, with frag­ments of Music for Mal­lets weav­ing in and out above every­thing else. This work struck at the heart of what the cura­tors were try­ing to achieve with this fes­ti­val, by directly syn­the­sis­ing a clas­si­cal work and a DJ set. If any­thing, I would say that the fes­ti­val could have used more of this type of col­lab­o­ra­tion. Because the dif­fer­ent media and gen­res show­cased in the fes­ti­val often appeared in sep­a­rate events at sep­a­rate venues, it was easy to ignore what you were less inter­ested in, and to focus only on the clas­si­cal music or on the DJ par­ties or on the sym­posia. But by putting the two types of music in one con­cert, and ensur­ing that the audi­ence lis­tened to both, the cura­tors achieved a fusion of styles and pro­vided the nec­es­sary con­text for fruit­ful dis­cus­sion and col­lab­o­ra­tion across genres.

Just’s remix was sand­wiched between two works by Eliz­a­beth Hoff­man, an Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor in com­po­si­tion at New York Uni­ver­sity. The first work, Ascen­sion, was a tape piece — the only work on either of the pro­grams that didn’t involve any live per­form­ers. The sec­ond work, Vis­sera, was for per­cus­sion trio and live elec­tron­ics. Both works showed Hoff­man to be a com­poser pre­oc­cu­pied with ques­tions of tim­bre, who took the festival’s focus at its most ele­men­tal level. She was the only com­poser who used a wide vari­ety of per­cus­sion instru­ments, instead of lim­it­ing her­self to a few of one type or another. In this way, her work had more in com­mon with the many Amer­i­can com­posers who have been explor­ing expanded per­cus­sion tim­bres through­out the twen­ti­eth century.

The final work on the pro­gram was Bern­hard Lang’s Mon­adolo­gie IV, for three drum kits. As in Differenz/Wiederholung 2, Lang drew on a philo­soph­i­cal text as his source of inspi­ra­tion — in this case, Got­tfried Leibnitz’s Mon­adol­ogy. Leib­nitz sketches in this text a meta­physics based on the idea that every­thing in the world is derived from sim­ple cells, called mon­ads. The par­al­lels between this idea and Lang’s aes­thetic are easy to see: Lang derives his works from sim­ple motivic cells, which he con­stantly expands, repeats, and varies.

In Mon­adolo­gie IV, Lang com­bined his aes­thetic of rep­e­ti­tion and vari­a­tion with a desire to return to the basics of per­cus­sion — the drum kit. In this way Lang’s work par­al­leled Furrer’s Music for Mal­lets. Lang wanted to strip away all the extra sounds and instru­ments that have entered the percussionist’s arse­nal in the last few decades — no chimes, no marimba, just drums. “The drum set is a kind of musi­cal sign or sym­bol for jazz music, for rock music, and it’s both the sound and the energy which inter­ests me,” says Lang, “and in Mon­adolo­gie IV, it’s espe­cially the energy of three drum­mers play­ing together, one drum set in the mid­dle being the engine for the whole piece.” The end result was a pow­er­ful work that had the energy and momen­tum of Differenz/Wiederholung 2 despite the pared-down tim­bre. It was a great finale to
the concert.

Posted by Naomi Perley on Oct 21st, 2009 and filed under Music Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

Leave a Reply