Grab our RSS Feed

Stanley Fish Has no Chili Peppers on Ratemyprofessors.com

by Advocate Staff


With the Human­i­ties fac­ing exis­ten­tial bud­get cuts and the indus­tri­al­ized world melt­ing down in the great­est credit cri­sis since the last scene of Fight Club, Stan­ley Fish may be “the last pro­fes­sor,” but the Florida Inter­na­tional Uni­ver­sity Law Pro­fes­sor is cer­tainly not the hottest. Or at least that’s the ver­dict of his stu­dents on ratemyprofessors.com, regard­ing the sex­i­ness of the some­what famous, 170 year-old Mil­ton scholar whose New York Times blog prob­a­bly annoys you.

Ratemyprofessors.com is a web­site on the “inter­net” that allows stu­dents to rant or, con­versely, rave about their col­lege and uni­ver­sity teach­ers in brief com­men­taries. They can also rate them, on a point scale, on their eas­i­ness, clar­ity, help­ful­ness, rater inter­est in the sub­ject, and, of course, most impor­tantly, their hotness.

Hot­ness, or as it is more tra­di­tion­ally known, fuck-ability is a nearly uni­ver­sally desir­able attribute in human cul­tures and soci­eties. And although it is to a great extent deter­mined by the norms of a given period and cul­ture, “it is dif­fi­cult to imag­ine any pos­si­ble con­text in which Stan­ley Fish would be con­sid­ered hot,” writes one stu­dent on the site.

Or as another stu­dent extremely fac­tual and objec­tive stu­dent put it, “Old, white, and beady-eyed, with a whiny voice that sounds like he’s mock­ingly imi­tat­ing him­self, the last time Pro­fes­sor Fish got laid was the day before the con­cept of sex­ual harass­ment was invented, which was too late for the donkey.”

Crit­ics might argue that he has that one author photo on the cover of The Trou­ble with Prin­ci­ple where he looks kind of okay, not “like you wanna throw up in your mouth, IMAO,” as another mod­est stu­dent con­tri­bu­tion to ratemyprofessor.com has it. The pho­tog­ra­pher did a rea­son­able job of hid­ing his less-than-flattering Cindy Craw­ford mole, and his jowls appear to have been taped to the back of his neck. Mean­while, his hair looks sur­pris­ingly tou­sled and full. As one com­ment on Ratemyprofessors.com reads, “Where did he get that wig?”

But if my sources, Mark and Kram Schiebe, are cor­rect, then Pro­fes­sor Fish, who is an Eng­lish Civil War vet­eran, stole it from his mother’s trunk on the slave ship his fam­ily gain­fully oper­ated to arrive in the New World. Or, as one of the reviews online reads: “When Prof. Fish went to school, they didn’t have History!”

But most of his law stu­dents, as polled by the sta­tis­ti­cal firm of Dewey, Cheetem, and Howe, think either his wife painted that photo or that it is some­one else entirely. Indeed, my con­fi­den­tial sources for such mat­ters, gigo­los Mark and Kram Schiebe, told me she con­fessed to it to them. “We told her we wouldn’t make her life worth liv­ing any­more if she didn’t come clean about how she’d enhanced that photo,” said the Schiebes, who looked like they’d been vio­lated, when they stepped off the plan from Miami.

When asked why they’d hired a blog­ger who’s almost as ugly as Mau­reen Dowd, the senior pub­lic spokesper­son for The Times, Ramk Beschie, said he couldn’t talk right now because Dowd had been sit­ting on his face for the last sev­eral hours.

Beschie finally emailed a response later in the day. “Look, com­pared to Dowd, he’s com­pletely beau­ti­ful. I mean, she makes Medusa look like Helen of Troy. Besides at least Fish is a bot­tom. My jaw hurts.”

Posted by Advocate Staff on Mar 15th, 2009 and filed under Back Page. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

Leave a Reply