Grab our RSS Feed

Give it Back! Getting New York’s Wealthiest to Pay Their Fair Share

by Advocate Staff


From the Editor

Expe­ri­ence demands that man is the only ani­mal which devours his own kind, for I can apply no milder term to the gen­eral prey of the rich on the poor.” –Thomas Jefferson

Hey baby, nobody suf­fers like the poor!” –Charles Bukowski

I know it’s dif­fi­cult, espe­cially for the major­ity of GC stu­dents fac­ing sev­eral years of fruit­less job searches and adjunct lec­tur­ing in pur­suit of that cov­eted $55,000 a year tenure track gig; but take a minute and imag­ine what it would be like to make $200,000 a year. For most of us this num­ber must seem out­ra­geously large: four or five times our cur­rent yearly wages and a lot more than even the most well paid and dis­tin­guished pro­fes­sor makes at CUNY; but nonethe­less, give it a shot.

How would your life be dif­fer­ent? Would you finally be able to afford your own apart­ment instead of giv­ing your money to a land­lord or liv­ing with room­mates? Would you finally feel secure enough to let your spouse take time off from work to have a child, and would you take com­fort in the fact that your child would grow up in a safe and healthy envi­ron­ment? Would you be able to set aside a col­lege fund and make sure that they received the best edu­ca­tion and health care avail­able? Would you take vaca­tions in Europe or the Caribbean, eat at more of the great restau­rants New York has to offer, or become a sub­scriber to the Met­ro­pol­i­tan Opera? Of course you could do any or all of these things if you made $200,000 a year. In fact with a life­time of that kind of income you could eas­ily retire in your early six­ties and spend a sig­nif­i­cant part of your adult life doing what­ever you liked, vol­un­teer­ing your time in a mean­ing­ful way that helped make the world a bet­ter place. Indeed, let’s face it, regard­less of what you might think about the rich or how much you believe, like Roger Waters, that money “is the root of all evil today,” life would be pretty good if you made just that much money wouldn’t it?

Now imag­ine if you were mak­ing $250,000 or $300,000 or even $3million; would those extra dol­lars really make you any hap­pier? Would more vaca­tions or a more expen­sive house really make your life any more ful­fill­ing? Per­haps for some of you they would, but the fact is that even a mod­er­ate amount of income, much less than $250,000 can sus­tain great hap­pi­ness. As Har­vard Uni­ver­sity psy­chol­o­gist Daniel Gilbert writes in his book Stum­bling on Hap­pi­ness: “Amer­i­cans who earn $50,000 per year are much hap­pier than those who earn $10,000 per year…but Amer­i­cans who earn $5 mil­lion per year are not much hap­pier than those who earn $100,000 per year.” In other words, regard­less of the actual dol­lar amounts, Gilbert’s find­ings make it clear that after a cer­tain level of basic com­fort and secu­rity, more wealth does not mean more hap­pi­ness. The sad part is that even that basic level of com­fort and secu­rity is becom­ing more and more dif­fi­cult to attain, as fewer and fewer peo­ple con­trol larger amounts of the nation’s wealth.

So if many of us would be delighted to make even a mere $150,000 a year, and the facts indi­cate that much more than that doesn’t really seem to make any­one any hap­pier, why does the New York State income tax sys­tem insist on tak­ing the same per­cent­age of income from those who have lit­tle or noth­ing to spare as it does from those who already have more than enough, and accord­ing to Gilbert would suf­fer noth­ing should they take home a lit­tle less each year? Why is it that, given the state’s record break­ing bud­get deficit, the gov­er­nor, rather than increas­ing taxes on those who already have every­thing they need, is instead propos­ing to raise costs and slash ser­vices for those who can least afford to pay more or to go with less?

Not only does Gov­er­nor Pater­son want to slash Med­ic­aid, which obvi­ously affects only those with­out ade­quate health insur­ance (i.e. the poor) but as we have all heard, he is also plan­ning to increase tuition at CUNY and SUNY cam­puses by a total of $600 per year. Since many of you read­ing this are no doubt try­ing to piece together a mea­ger liv­ing teach­ing CUNY stu­dents, I don’t have to tell you how lit­tle they already have and how hard they work just to stay on top of their tuition bills, much less their course read­ing and home­work. Add to this Paterson’s pro­pos­als to slash the MTA bud­get, which will likely result in sig­nif­i­cant cuts in ser­vice as well as a poten­tial fare increase, and it’s not hard to see the eco­nomic war that is being waged on the work­ing poor of New York. While the poor are being asked to pay more and to get by with less in almost every aspect of their daily lives, those mak­ing well above $250,000 a year are being asked to sac­ri­fice absolutely nothing.

Cur­rently the New York State tax on income over $40,000 is 6.85%. That rate applies not only to those mak­ing $40,000 a year but to every­one mak­ing more than that mar­gin­ally liv­able wage, regard­less of how many mil­lions of dol­lars they bring home each year. That means that many of us are prob­a­bly pay­ing exactly the same per­cent­age of taxes as our esteemed Chan­cel­lor Gold­stein, who makes $540,000 a year in wages and perks and has largely bent over back­wards to accom­mo­date the governor’s pro­pos­als for tuition hikes, while at the same time giv­ing him­self sev­eral sig­nif­i­cant raises. Indeed, since the late ‘70s New York State has reduced income taxes for the wealth­i­est New York­ers by more than 50 per­cent, while simul­ta­ne­ously slash­ing ser­vices, rais­ing pub­lic col­lege and uni­ver­sity tuition, and elim­i­nat­ing vital city and state pro­grams. It is pre­cisely this trend: giv­ing tax breaks to the rich, and not the oft-touted eco­nomic bur­den of pro­vid­ing ser­vices to the poor that has cre­ated the enor­mous deficit the state now faces. Indeed, as other com­men­ta­tors have aptly noted, this fis­cal cri­sis is very specif­i­cally a cri­sis of rev­enue, not spend­ing, and to try to solve it by fur­ther cut­ting spend­ing while refus­ing to increase rev­enue only goes to show how lit­tle our state rep­re­sen­ta­tives actu­ally care about the liv­ing con­di­tions of the major­ity of their constituency.

Thank­fully, there is a grow­ing num­ber of cit­i­zens, unions, and grass­roots polit­i­cal orga­ni­za­tions who are push­ing for a more rea­son­able and moral solu­tion to the cur­rent state bud­get cri­sis, one that seeks to dis­trib­ute the bur­den of that cri­sis in a more equi­table way. The Work­ing Fam­i­lies Party in con­junc­tion with sev­eral state and munic­i­pal unions have pro­posed what they are call­ing a Fair Share Tax Reform bill. Intro­duced in the New York State Sen­ate by Sen­a­tor Eric Schnie­der­man, the Fair Share Tax Reform Bill pro­poses a mod­est increase in taxes on those New York­ers mak­ing above $250,000. The bill, which is gain­ing momen­tum in the state leg­is­la­ture (Thanks in part to the deter­mined efforts of ordi­nary cit­i­zens and grass­roots orga­ni­za­tions), would raise the state tax rate on those mak­ing more than $250,000 from 6.85 per­cent to 8.25 per­cent. Like­wise those mak­ing more than half a mil­lion a year would see their state tax rise to 8.97 per­cent, while those mak­ing more than a mil­lion dol­lars a year would be asked to pay 10.3 percent.

Even at the high­est tax bracket pro­posed in the Fair Share Tax Reform Bill, this is a total increase of only 3.45 per­cent. That 3.45 per­cent, how­ever, would, accord­ing to Fis­cal Pol­icy Insti­tute of the New York State Depart­ment of Tax­a­tion and Finance, gen­er­ate as much as $6 bil­lion a year for New York State. Fur­ther­more, these increases would affect only a small por­tion of New York­ers, (only the wealth­i­est 3.25 per­cent, accord­ing to The Work­ing Fam­i­lies Party) and the few who would actu­ally be affected are, let’s face it, uniquely sit­u­ated to with­stand a small decrease in their annual income.

Although there seems to be a grow­ing con­sen­sus in the leg­is­la­ture that some kind of pro­gres­sive tax reform is nec­es­sary, oppo­nents of the Fair Share Tax Reform are gear­ing up to seek major com­pro­mises to the bill that would force more of the bur­den for the bud­get deficit onto poor work­ing fam­i­lies. As the April 1 dead­line for the next New York State bud­get quickly approaches, now is the time to take action. Con­tact your state sen­a­tor and con­gressper­son: send them a hand­writ­ten let­ter, send them a fax, or call them on the phone, and insist that they fully sup­port, with­out com­pro­mise, the Fair Share Tax Reform pack­age cur­rently being con­sid­ered by the state leg­is­la­ture. Even as the poor­est Amer­i­cans have become increas­ingly poor, the small minor­ity of wealthy Amer­i­cans have ben­e­fit­ted from decades of gov­ern­ment give­aways. Now’s the time to take it back; The Fair Share Tax Reform Bill is a good first step in that direction.

More From The Editor’s Desk

Posted by Advocate Staff on Mar 15th, 2009 and filed under From The Editor's Desk, Opinion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

Leave a Reply