Grab our RSS Feed

Four Plays are Better than Some

by Frank Episale


Sol­i­dar­ity” from Billy Elliot

I don’t know how you do it, Frank. Every time I look out at the the­atre scene in this city, all I see is a lot of crap.” This state­ment was part of an email I received last sum­mer while try­ing to decide what I would write about for an upcom­ing arti­cle. When I was an under­grad­u­ate, one of my pro­fes­sors con­fessed to the class that he had long ago stopped see­ing the­atre because it was so often a dis­ap­point­ment and he found it per­son­ally painful to see bad the­atre. I myself have gone through long stretches when I’ve ques­tioned my cho­sen field of study, not so much because of the ter­ri­ble shows, but because of the mediocre shows. These most deadly of pro­duc­tions show­case bland com­pe­tence and work­man­like pro­fes­sion­al­ism that gar­ner respect­ful applause from an audi­ence that won’t remem­ber the details of what they saw even a week later.

But then there are sea­sons like this one. Show after show, week after week, I’m reminded why I study the­atre and why I live in New York. The past month has taken me from DUMBO to Broad­way, SoHo to the East Vil­lage, with ticket prices rang­ing from $15 to $125. I gen­er­ally avoid describ­ing any­thing as “exu­ber­antly the­atri­cal,” a phrase fre­quently employed by crit­ics who want to make sure they’re quoted in a theatre’s pub­lic­ity mate­r­ial. That’s pre­cisely what most of the per­for­mances I’ve seen recently have exhib­ited, though: an exu­ber­ant the­atri­cal­ity that rewards fans and stu­dents of the the­atre but doesn’t pun­ish novices, that cel­e­brates the medium of the the­atre with­out den­i­grat­ing other media, that chal­lenges the audi­ence while also being sure to reward them. Fol­low­ing then, are brief responses to the four shows I’ve seen most recently, in the order in which I saw them.

Mabou Mines’ Doll­House, a rad­i­cal adap­ta­tion (directed by Lee Breuer, adapted by Breuer and Maude Mitchell) of Hen­rik Ibsen’s most famous play, debuted at St. Ann’s Ware­house in 2003 and has spent the last sev­eral years tour­ing the world to near-unanimous acclaim. Last month, the show returned to St. Ann’s to com­plete the final leg of its tour. Famously, all of the men in the pro­duc­tion are less than five feet tall, while all of the women are over six feet tall. The set (designed by Narelle Sis­sons), a fold­able, doll house-like struc­ture that ren­ders the play’s title lit­eral, is scaled to be a com­fort­able fit for the men and the chil­dren while the women in the play are forced to crouch and con­tort them­selves to pass through doors or sit on furniture.

While the lit­tle peo­ple are the hook that most press releases and reviews focus on, this high-concept visual gim­mick is only the begin­ning of direc­tor Lee Breuer’s inspired the­atri­cal mad­ness. Red vel­vet cur­tains descend to envelop the space, enclos­ing the audi­ence in a 19th-century melo­drama, or per­haps a faded opera house. Night­mare sequences fea­tur­ing stilt walk­ers, giant pup­pets (designed by Jane Cather­ine Shaw), and las­civ­i­ous musi­cians inter­rupt the nar­ra­tive from time to time. Ibsen’s exper­i­ments in nat­u­ral­ism are glee­fully tossed aside and replaced with Breuer’s exper­i­ment in melo­dra­matic excess. A por­trait of Ibsen’s rival, play­wright August Strind­berg, hangs on the wall of the doll house. The final scene exchanges melo­drama for opera, as Nora (bril­liantly played by Mitchell) is trans­formed into a Wag­ner­ian valkyrie cum Rapun­zel who tow­ers over the entire set, singing a tri­umphant farewell aria while a cho­rus of pup­pets bicker and wail, trapped in their sti­fling, emo­tion­ally vio­lent mar­riages. What saves the show from col­laps­ing under the weight of its pre­ten­sions is a mis­chie­vous, relent­less sense of humor that invites the audi­ence to be in on the joke even as they gape in dis­be­lief at the sheer spec­ta­cle of it all.

While Broad­way musi­cals are often thought of as lav­ish and spec­tac­u­lar, Billy Elliot is sub­dued and visu­ally con­ser­v­a­tive in com­par­i­son to Breuer’s Doll­House. Writ­ten by Lee Hall, directed by Stephen Daldry, and fea­tur­ing music by Elton John, the new musi­cal was adapted from the 2000 film of the same name (which was also writ­ten by Hall and directed by Daldry). Set against the back­drop of Britain’s dev­as­tat­ing 1984 minework­ers’ strike, Billy Elliot is the story of a boy who dis­cov­ers, much to his sur­prise, that he has a tal­ent for, and a love of, danc­ing. Like blue-collar dance tales from Foot­loose to Flash­dance, this one is a feel-good tale at heart, the poverty and oppres­sive moral code of the com­mu­nity serv­ing pri­mar­ily as a foil for the hopes and ambi­tions of the pro­tag­o­nist. Unlike those oth­ers, though, this show suc­ceeds in keep­ing its class issues rel­a­tively front-and-center, and even in main­tain­ing some polit­i­cal bite. “Sol­i­dar­ity,” a major pro­duc­tion num­ber half-way through the first act, takes pains to dra­ma­tize (and chore­o­graph) the strike, while the sec­ond act opens with “Merry Christ­mas, Mag­gie Thatcher,” a song in which the min­ers cheer­fully wish for their prime minister’s death.

It is tempt­ing for many to claim that its pol­i­tics are what sets Billy Elliot apart from other shows, but this is hardly the first high-profile musi­cal to tackle such issues. Canon­i­cal musi­cal the­atre fare – from Show­boat, to South Pacific, to Okla­homa!, to West Side Story, to Hair among oth­ers – has con­fronted class, race, and other such top­i­cal mat­ters again and again, with vary­ing degrees of suc­cess. Each time, the show in ques­tion is her­alded as a sur­prise, an excep­tion to what we imag­ine to be the vapid musi­cal norm.

What really sets Billy Elliot apart from so much other Broad­way fare is the pal­pa­ble com­mit­ment of its cast, the infec­tious joy that they exude while per­form­ing. Also unusual for a musi­cal is that the music itself is mostly for­get­table; I don’t imag­ine that a great many cast record­ings are going to be sold in the the­atre lobby. This is in part because the young actors per­form­ing in the title role (Kiril Kul­ish, who starred when I attended the show, is one of three boys who play Billy in rota­tion) were cast more for their danc­ing than for their singing. Kul­ish can carry a tune, but he doesn’t own the stage until he starts to dance. The entire team seems aware of where the show’s strengths lie, though, and they play those strengths for all they’re worth. Daldry’s direc­tion, Ian MacNeil’s ele­gantly effec­tive set, and even John’s music are all designed to take a back seat to Billy and his friends when they begin to pirou­ette. (My mother, who was my guest at the per­for­mance, would be greatly dis­ap­pointed if I did not at least men­tion show-stopper David Bologna, who plays Billy’s flam­ing best friend Michael with charisma, con­fi­dence, and show­man­ship that are as effec­tive as they are cal­cu­lated, and who pre­sides over the production’s sin­gle most mem­o­rable song, a cel­e­bra­tion of cross-dressing and indi­vid­u­al­ity called “Express­ing Yourself”).

Show-stopping dance num­bers were osten­si­bly anath­ema to the Chau­tauqua lec­ture cir­cuit that flour­ished in the rural United States in the late 19th and early 20th cen­turies. A pro-science, pro-temperance alter­na­tive to reli­gious revivals and vaude­ville acts, the lec­tures were education-as-entertainment, and were extremely pop­u­lar while they lasted. The iron­i­cally named National The­ater of the United States of Amer­ica (NTUSA) has put together their own Chau­tauqua! event, an evening of lec­tures and enter­tain­ments that fea­tures guest speak­ers, slide-shows, his­tor­i­cal reen­act­ments, and the kind of song-and-dance diver­sions that even­tu­ally crept into the pop­u­lar lec­ture cir­cuit as it became more and more of a cod­i­fied busi­ness model. In some ways a med­i­ta­tion on the ten­sion between art and com­merce, enter­tain­ment and enlight­en­ment, Chau­tauqua! is pri­mar­ily an exten­sion of NTUSA’s ongo­ing project to make the­atre inspired by parathe­atri­cal events, and to demon­strate that the avant garde need be nei­ther self-serious nor inaccessible.

While the­atre is often seen as opposed to, and mar­gin­al­ized by, newer media, a gen­er­a­tion of video-game play­ing, comic-book read­ing genre geeks has emerged in the down­town the­atre scene and exploded the highbrow-lowbrow binary that osten­si­bly sep­a­rates the per­form­ing arts from mass cul­ture. At the epi­cen­ter of this scene-within-a-scene are Vam­pire Cow­boys, a young com­pany devoted to stage com­bat and genre mash-ups. VC’s most recent con­coc­tion, Soul Samu­rai, is Kill Bill meets The War­riors, a col­li­sion of mar­tial arts and blax­ploita­tion tropes that fea­tures post-apocalyptic kung-fu vam­pires, home­less pup­pets, and bound­less energy. Full of wink­ing ref­er­ences to count­less movies, TV shows, and col­lectible action fig­ures, and fea­tur­ing one extended action sequence after another, Soul Samu­rai nev­er­the­less man­ages to show­case some really good act­ing at almost every turn. (Paco Tol­son, as samu­rai side­kick Cert, is par­tic­u­larly win­ning). The 5 mem­bers of the cast play 19 roles over the course of 100 breath­less min­utes, man­ag­ing to win the hearts of the audi­ence even as they jug­gle whirl­wind cos­tume changes, funny voices, and an array of move­ment styles rang­ing from Tae Kwon Do to Capoeira. Play­wright / fight direc­tor Qui Nguyen and direc­tor Robert Ross Parker have pro­duced a smart, unapolo­get­i­cally funny show that lays claim to story mate­r­ial from movies and comic books even as it cel­e­brates the­atri­cal­ity and the inim­itable thrill of live acting.

None of these shows is per­fect. Doll­House some­times shows signs of Breuer’s hubris­tic self-satisfaction; Billy Elliot, an exor­bi­tantly expen­sive show about poverty, occa­sion­ally sac­ri­fices nar­ra­tive coherency for aggres­sive pac­ing, Chau­tauqua! drags in places and is often rough around the edges; and Soul Samu­rai doesn’t always main­tain its high-wire bal­ance of par­ody, trib­ute, and post-identity pol­i­tics to which it aspires. Each of them, though, is a part of a sea­son that has made me excited to go to the the­atre again. I’ve got tick­ets com­ing up to La Didone, the Wooster Group’s new sci-fi decon­struc­tion of a baroque opera, and Rambo Solo, a popcorn-fueled show about a guy who sets out to re-enact First Blood in his stu­dio apartment.

I can hardly wait.

Posted by Frank Episale on Mar 15th, 2009 and filed under Theatre Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

Leave a Reply