Grab our RSS Feed

Free Choice and Adjunct Equity

by Renee McGarry


In a news con­fer­ence on Fri­day, Jan­u­ary 30, Mayor Bloomberg announced what many are refer­ring to as his dooms­day bud­get. This included one bil­lion dol­lars in bud­get cuts, the core of which calls for lay­ing off over 23,000 city work­ers. Accord­ing to Bloomberg, the major­ity of these work­ers will be New York City pub­lic school teach­ers — as many as 15,000 of them may lose their jobs as the city faces an ongo­ing bud­get crunch with lit­tle to no help from the state. In addi­tion to these lay-offs, Bloomberg expects to dra­mat­i­cally increase sales tax in the city and also to ask prop­erty own­ers to return their $400 tax rebates.

Not sur­pris­ingly, the city (and state) is again look­ing to bal­ance their bud­get on the back of work­ers, explic­itly stat­ing that they need give­backs from munic­i­pal unions in order to pre­vent these lay­offs. If munic­i­pal unions agree, work­ers will at the very least be expected to pay more for their health care, and it isn’t dif­fi­cult to imag­ine what else they will be asked to do. Not only are we faced with the pos­si­bil­ity of these give­backs, and an increase in sales tax, but we will also suf­fer a dra­matic increase in MTA fares, and what­ever else the city and its agen­cies throws in our direction.

In times like these anti-union rhetoric looms large. In its arti­cle about the pro­posed bud­get cuts and lay­offs on Jan­u­ary 30, the New York Daily News mildly referred to a lack of coop­er­a­tion from “stub­born unions” through­out the city. The New York Post wasn’t far behind. But union-bashing doesn’t just exist in these con­ser­v­a­tive venues. In fact, we can see it in the com­ments sec­tions of the New York Times web­site, on Gothamist, and in prac­ti­cally every other news source. Pub­lic employ­ees are reg­u­larly referred to as “free­load­ers,” “over­paid,” and “lazy”: these are among the tamest of insults.

Unfor­tu­nately, these feel­ings about unions, union­iza­tion, and union mem­bers are not lim­ited to the local stage, nor are they lim­ited to some abstract inter­net per­son­al­i­ties hurl­ing insults in our direc­tion. The Employee Free Choice Act, sup­ported by Pres­i­dent Obama while he was in the Sen­ate but notably absent from his eco­nomic stim­u­lus pack­age, is at the cen­ter of many of these anti-union argu­ments. Sup­port­ers of the bill her­ald it as one of the great­est changes to labor leg­is­la­tion since the pas­sage of the National Labor Rela­tions Act in 1935 and argue that it would make it much eas­ier for work­ers to union­ize, osten­si­bly elim­i­nat­ing a multi-tiered and pos­si­bly years-long cer­ti­fi­ca­tions process by elim­i­nat­ing the need for secret ballots.

Crit­ics of the act argue that by elim­i­nat­ing secret bal­lots, unions will be more likely to bully work­ers into sign­ing on. (It is impor­tant to note that the act does not elim­i­nate the pos­si­bil­ity of com­pli­cated secret bal­lot vot­ing but allows for the addi­tional option of cer­ti­fy­ing a union after a major­ity of employ­ees sign union autho­riza­tion cards.) The rhetoric sur­round­ing this act has esca­lated beyond that of stub­born­ness and free-loading. On a con­fer­ence call with other CEOS, the CEO of the noto­ri­ously anti-labor Home Depot referred to the act as “the end of civ­i­liza­tion as we know it.” In an inter­view on the Fox News Net­work on Sat­ur­day, Jan­u­ary 31, a top edi­tor at Forbes mag­a­zine called the bill “pro-slavery.” The scope and out­landish­ness of these claims can seem shock­ing but it’s not at all surprising.

Of course this bill makes CEOs ner­vous. Stud­ies show that union mem­bers have 14% higher pay than those who aren’t union­ized and are 28% more likely to have employer-paid health care. The Employee Free Choice Act will cost com­pa­nies a great deal of money if it passes. But what’s trou­bling is when we hear sim­i­lar argu­ments in our day-to-day lives.

As adjuncts and fel­lows, we have the oppor­tu­nity to do some­thing about this. We can sign union cards and become vocal and active mem­bers in a large munic­i­pal union. If you haven’t yet signed a union card, now is the time to do it.

Liv­ing in times of eco­nomic inse­cu­rity, with our fates in the hands of union lead­er­ship, we need to let them know what we are and aren’t will­ing to do. Are we will­ing to pay more for the same health care, espe­cially hav­ing just won access to it in Jan­u­ary? Are we will­ing to teach fewer classes of more stu­dents? Are we will­ing to see our friends get laid off and their stu­dents added to our sections?

Sign­ing a union card and vot­ing in union elec­tions is not the only way to be active in this fight; we also have the oppor­tu­nity to be vocal and pro-union in our every­day lives. From March 30 – April 3, the Adjunct Project is spon­sor­ing CUNY Equity Week, a university-wide event that offers the oppor­tu­nity for all fac­ulty mem­bers to dis­cuss the plight of con­tin­gent work­ers in the CUNY sys­tem. Dur­ing this week we are ask­ing fac­ulty to make a coor­di­nated effort to incor­po­rate infor­ma­tion on adjunct teach­ing con­di­tions and the impact these have on our students.

There are a lot of ways you can incor­po­rate this infor­ma­tion into your class­room. You may have a class dis­cus­sion, a per­sua­sive letter-writing exer­cise, a sta­tis­ti­cal analy­sis of adjunct and full-time wages for the same work­load, or an extra-credit assign­ment to find a link between course mate­ri­als and adjunct labor. Adjuncts teach nearly 60% of all classes at CUNY, and often­times stu­dents are unaware of this, or that the posi­tion of an adjunct is rad­i­cally dif­fer­ent than that of full-time fac­ulty members.

Talk to you stu­dents about what it means: how does it impact your rela­tion­ships with them? Your abil­ity to teach your courses to the best of your abil­ity? Your work­ing con­di­tions? If you can’t have office hours because they are unpaid or there is no loca­tion for you to do so, let your stu­dents know. Alert­ing stu­dents to these sit­u­a­tions makes them more aware of how the ways in which adjuncts are treated unequally impacts their education.

Set aside a class ses­sion or two, or less time if you like, to talk about these inequal­i­ties in your class­room. Attend one of our train­ing ses­sions and learn what you can say and how to say it. Allow some­one else to come into your class­room to dis­cuss the role of con­tin­gent work­ers in the CUNY sys­tem. Just start­ing a con­ver­sa­tion can make a world of dif­fer­ence and can call atten­tion to just how dif­fer­ent a uni­ver­sity we would have with more full-time fac­ulty mem­bers and greater opportunities.

Most impor­tantly, CUNY Equity Week is your week. Do what you want to do in your class­rooms and beyond. Be cre­ative, and let us know your ideas so we can share them.

If adding just one more thing to your sched­ule is mak­ing your mind spin, we also invite you to join us for a spe­cial ses­sion on yoga for stu­dents and adjuncts on Fri­day, Feb­ru­ary 20 at 6pm (sug­gested dona­tion $5). A cer­ti­fied yoga teacher will help us cre­ate a tool­box of cop­ing mech­a­nisms for when our back hurts from writ­ing our dis­ser­ta­tion all day, our head hurts from teach­ing, and what­ever else hurts from what­ever else we do. We look for­ward to see­ing you there! 

Posted by Renee McGarry on Feb 15th, 2009 and filed under Adjuncting. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

Leave a Reply