Grab our RSS Feed

California Dreaming (at Juilliard)

by Naomi Perley


Chi­nary Ung’

FOCUS! Fes­ti­val at Lin­coln Center.

In try­ing to untie the many strands of clas­si­cal music’s sto­ried his­tory, one of the most com­mon tech­niques is to pro­ceed country-by-country: the Austro-German school with its musi­cal super­heroes (Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Haydn, Brahms) osten­si­bly dom­i­nates, but there are equally fas­ci­nat­ing sto­ries to be told about the his­to­ries of the French, Ital­ian, Russ­ian, British, and of course, Amer­i­can musi­cal traditions.

Juilliard’s recent FOCUS! fes­ti­val went one step fur­ther, focus­ing on the music of just one state: Cal­i­for­nia. In his thought­ful intro­duc­tory note to the FOCUS! pro­gramme book­let, the festival’s direc­tor Joel Sachs asks: “Is there a ‘Cal­i­for­nia music’ and, if so, what is it?” His reply: “Yes, and it is every­thing imag­in­able, and more.” After attend­ing five of the festival’s six con­certs, I have to agree whole­heart­edly with this assess­ment. As I sat in the the­atre, I expe­ri­enced the audi­tory equiv­a­lent of strolling around a World’s Fair. While California’s most renowned com­posers, Henry Cow­ell and John Adams, fea­tured promi­nently in the fes­ti­val, the vast major­ity of the works per­formed each night were by rel­a­tively obscure com­posers. The fes­ti­val pre­sented an excel­lent oppor­tu­nity to get to know some works that rarely travel across the country.

The most excit­ing per­for­mances were those that involved elec­tron­ics, extended tech­niques, or unusual instru­ments. This is not sim­ply because these works by neces­sity have a unique sound, quite dis­tinc­tive from stan­dard cham­ber music con­cert fare. Rather, I was con­tin­u­ally amazed by both Juilliard’s will­ing­ness to pro­gram such uncon­ven­tional works, and by the extra­or­di­nar­ily high level of per­for­mance attained by the stu­dents involved in the fes­ti­val. Finally, while the fes­ti­val proved through sheer quan­tity that Cal­i­forn­ian music is “every­thing,” these were the works that res­onated most strongly with my pre­con­cep­tion of what Cal­i­for­nia music might be.

The finale of the Jan­u­ary 26 con­cert, Chi­nary Ung’s Grand Alap — “A Win­dow in the Sky”—is a case in point. Ung, who was born in 1942, grew up in Cam­bo­dia and later came to the United States to con­tinue his musi­cal stud­ies. In addi­tion to his train­ing as a clas­si­cal com­poser, he has exten­sively researched tra­di­tional Cam­bo­dian music, and his com­po­si­tions fuse East­ern and West­ern styles and instru­ments. This type of cul­tural fusion seems endemic to Cal­i­forn­ian music — it reaches back past the mid­cen­tury immi­grants to Amer­ica such as Ung, to California’s ear­li­est com­posers, such as American-born Henry Cow­ell, who grew up along­side Asian immi­grants in the slums of San Fran­cisco, and for­ward to California-born com­posers such as Gabriela Lena Frank, whose mother was of Peruvian-Chinese ances­try, and whose father was a Lithuan­ian Jew.

Grand Alap, for cello and per­cus­sion, derives its title from the open­ing, impro­visatory pas­sage of Indian Raga music, the alap. Ung merges this Indian con­cept with musi­cal mate­ri­als derived from the tra­di­tions of South and South­east Asia, to cre­ate a work of great beauty and intense emo­tion. To say that this is merely a work for cello and per­cus­sion would be mis­lead­ing; both the cel­list and per­cus­sion­ist have exten­sive vocal parts as well. For instru­men­tal­ists, there are few con­cepts more daunt­ing than singing alone in pub­lic. I think it has to do with not being able to medi­ate our voices through our instru­ments, as we are accus­tomed to doing. That being said, these two tal­ented musi­cians rose to the task and per­formed beau­ti­fully. This was with­out a doubt my favourite per­for­mance in a night full of excel­lent performances.

There were a few other com­po­si­tions in which the musi­cians were called on to use their voices instead of their instru­mentsonly in these instances as speak­ers. At the Jan­u­ary 26 con­cert, the pianist Evan Shin­ners per­formed Pauline Oliveros’s The Auto­bi­og­ra­phy of Lady Stein­way. Oliv­eros describes her com­po­si­tion thus: “The per­former imag­ines him­self to be the invis­i­ble voice of the piano and tells the sto­ries, rela­tion­ships and feel­ings that may be res­onat­ing within the piano.” The per­former not only acts out the part of the Stein­way, but in fact writes his own part. Shinners’s mono­logue detailed the (often humor­ous) daily tri­als and tribu­la­tions of a Stein­way, includ­ing an affair she once had with a Cana­dian pianist, Glenn Gould, who was con­sid­er­ate enough not to stamp all over her gold feet. I was sur­prised to learn that Shin­ner him­self was a pianist; his deliv­ery was so good, I assumed that he was an act­ing student.

One of my favourite works on the pro­gram was Paul Chihara’s Logs, which could be per­formed by any num­ber of dou­ble basses (at this per­for­mance, there were four). The work is part of a larger group of pieces deal­ing with trees, includ­ing Branches, Red­wood, Drift­wood, and For­est Music, to name a few. Logs con­sists of a main phrase and sev­eral con­trast­ing phrases which are con­tin­u­ously repeated and var­ied by the bassists. The double-bass is a per­fect choice for a piece about logs; the instru­ment, after all, is made out of wood, and is rather large. In addi­tion to the tra­di­tional means of play­ing a bass, that is by bow­ing or pluck­ing the strings, the bassists played on the instru­ments them­selves, treat­ing them almost as very del­i­cate per­cus­sion instru­ments. The result was a work of nat­u­ral­is­tic beauty that trans­ported me out of the con­cert hall, out of a cold New York in Jan­u­ary, and into one of California’s red­wood forests.

The ear­li­est com­poser rep­re­sented at the Focus! Fes­ti­val was Henry Cow­ell, one of America’s great mod­ernist com­posers. Cow­ell gained wide­spread noto­ri­ety in the 1920s for his rev­o­lu­tion­ary approach to the piano. In his many com­po­si­tions for the instru­ment, Cow­ell uses a vari­ety of tech­niques that no one before him had dared to intro­duce, such as using a fist or the entire fore­arm to play a whole clus­ter of notes at once, or reach­ing inside the piano to play on the strings them­selves. These advances in piano com­po­si­tion were impor­tant not just because of the unique sound that they imparted to his works, but because of the effect they had on later gen­er­a­tions of com­posers. In the 1940s, John Cage (a stu­dent of Cowell’s) began to “pre­pare” pianos by plac­ing objects such as screws and erasers on the strings, cre­at­ing a com­pletely dif­fer­ent tim­bre more akin to an East­ern per­cus­sion ensem­ble than a piano. Since the time of Cage and Cow­ell, many com­posers have begun to use extended tech­niques of all sorts on every instru­ment, includ­ing sev­eral of the com­posers fea­tured at the Focus! Festival.

Given this con­text, it was a won­der­ful treat to hear Eun­taek Kim play some of Cowell’s piano pieces on Jan­u­ary 28. Par­tic­u­larly excit­ing was his per­for­mance of The Harp of Life. In Cowell’s words, “Accord­ing to Irish mythol­ogy, the god of life cre­ated a new liv­ing crea­ture with each tone sounded on his great cos­mic harp, a harp described as reach­ing from above heaven to beneath hell.” The work con­sists basi­cally of a sim­ple melody, accom­pa­nied by tone clus­ters in the piano’s low­est range; these clus­ters start off as rum­bles in the depths of the instru­ment that grad­u­ally grow in inten­sity. Kim con­veyed all the nuances of this work with great com­mand, and in doing so, turned the focus away from the unusual tech­niques required of him by Cow­ell, and back to where it should be: on the music itself.

One aspect of Cal­i­forn­ian music that has gained recog­ni­tion through­out the coun­try is the pio­neer­ing work that has been done in the field of tape music, largely at the San Fran­cisco Tape Music Cen­ter. Out of the many tape and elec­tronic works pre­sented at the fes­ti­val, Ingram Marshall’s Fog Tropes, scored for tape and brass, stood out as the most obvi­ously Cal­i­forn­ian. The tape part con­sists of ambi­ent noise from the San Fran­cisco Bay, most notably the sound of foghorns, as well as some vocal­i­sa­tions and some sounds on the gam­buh, a Bali­nese bam­boo flute. The work’s cli­max is espe­cially strik­ing: as the lowest-sounding foghorns get louder and become more and more preva­lent in the work’s tex­ture, the brass sound a minor chord in uni­son above them.

Sachs admit­ted that since the point of FOCUS! is to pro­vide per­for­mance oppor­tu­ni­ties for Juilliard’s stu­dents, it had to “short­change” California’s performance-art scene. Most per­for­mance artists com­pose exclu­sively for them­selves, often not writ­ing down their music, thus mak­ing it nearly impos­si­ble for oth­ers to per­form their works. How­ever, the fes­ti­val did include one work by San Francisco-based Pamela Z. For the most part, Pamela Z com­poses for her own voice and elec­tron­ics. The work per­formed on Jan­u­ary 28, Four Move­ments for Cello and Delays, is in fact the only solely instru­men­tal work she has writ­ten. In each of the four move­ments, the cello and its delayed play­back inter­act in a dif­fer­ent way. In the first move­ment, the open­ing motive became an osti­nato under­ly­ing the rest of the move­ment, In the sec­ond, by con­trast, the cello’s long, rich melodies were super­im­posed on one another, so that at first, only one line was heard, then two in coun­ter­point, then three, and so on. The sense of for­mal cohe­sion and motivic unity present in each move­ment, com­bined with Pamela Z’s con­cep­tion of the cello as an exten­sion of the human voice, made this a work of incred­i­ble beauty, and pos­si­bly my favourite of the entire festival.

For the grand finale of the fes­ti­val, John Adams led Juilliard’s musi­cians (joined by the Con­cert Chorale of New York) in a mov­ing per­for­mance of Death of Kling­hof­fer. Con­cert per­for­mances of operas (where the opera is not staged at all, merely played and sung through) can often be quite dull, not to men­tion con­fus­ing. How­ever, this was eas­ily the most excit­ing con­cert per­for­mance of an opera I have seen to date. To begin with, the opera lends itself well to this type of pre­sen­ta­tion. The opera is mostly reflec­tive in char­ac­ter; the indi­vid­ual char­ac­ters have their own arias, which are inter­spersed with cho­ruses, but rarely do they inter­act in the way that they would in a play or in a more con­ven­tional opera. Most of the action takes place off­stage, and the char­ac­ters rarely enter into dia­logue with each other; rather they sing at each other. Beyond the opera’s nat­ural capac­ity for this type of per­for­mance, this pro­duc­tion tried to make the con­cert set­ting as real­is­tic as pos­si­ble. The char­ac­ters were all in cos­tume to some extent, and the cast did their best to act out the parts given the obvi­ous con­straints on their movements.

All told, Death of Kling­hof­fer pro­vided the per­fect end to a thrilling week of Cal­i­forn­ian music at the FOCUS! Fes­ti­val, and left me filled with antic­i­pa­tion for next year’s offerings.

Posted by Naomi Perley on Feb 15th, 2009 and filed under Music Reviews, Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

Leave a Reply