Grab our RSS Feed

GC Students Rally for Better Health Care

by Advocate Staff


Pro­test­ers at the March 18 rally about the health care cri­sis. Photo by Lisa Quiñones.

We’ve all heard the sto­ries: the CUNY grad­u­ate stu­dent who, upon real­iz­ing she had prob­a­bly sev­ered a nerve in her fin­ger, still con­tem­plated whether or not to go the emer­gency room; the CUNY grad­u­ate stu­dent who, with a bro­ken shoul­der, gave the hos­pi­tal a fake name so as to avoid the exor­bi­tant costs of an X-ray; or even worse, the CUNY grad­u­ate stu­dent who actu­ally had to give up his fel­low­ship in order to qual­ify for state funded Med­ic­aid care because he sim­ply had no other options. These sto­ries, all true, reveal the des­per­ate need for ade­quate and afford­able health care for CUNY grad­u­ate stu­dents. Although the Grad­u­ate Cen­ter offers a num­ber of dif­fer­ent health care plans, stu­dents and admin­is­tra­tion alike have begun to real­ize that the cur­rent health insur­ance options pro­vided for Grad­u­ate Cen­ter stu­dents, includ­ing GHI and the PSC Wel­fare Fund, are woe­fully inad­e­quate, and even worse, are often dis­trib­uted unequally among students.

Although health insur­ance has been a peren­nial con­cern of both stu­dents and the admin­is­tra­tion at CUNY; GC stu­dents, the Doc­toral Stu­dents’ Coun­cil, the Adjunct Project, and The Pro­fes­sional Staff Con­gress have all recently stepped up their calls for afford­able health insur­ance, orga­niz­ing a vig­or­ous cam­paign of action that has included meet­ings with CUNY offi­cials and peti­tions, let­ters, and phone calls to local and state politi­cians, all of which cul­mi­nated in a large demon­stra­tion on March 18 in front of the Grad­u­ate Cen­ter. This demon­stra­tion, orga­nized by the Adjunct Project and the PSC, was held to coin­cide with a visit to the GC from Chan­cel­lor Matthew Gold­stein. Esti­mates from the Adjunct Project sug­gest that there were between forty and fifty pro­tes­tors at the March 18 rally.

Although the GC had already been inves­ti­gat­ing poten­tial solu­tions to the GC health care cri­sis, these efforts have suc­cess­fully stepped up the pres­sure on the chancellor’s office, help­ing to bring the strug­gle for decent and afford­able health care directly to Albany, where many stu­dents and admin­is­tra­tors hope to find the fund­ing for improved health care options at CUNY.

Part of the impe­tus for and one of the most inter­est­ing aspects of this con­tin­u­ing strug­gle is the recent real­iza­tion that The State Uni­ver­sity of New York (SUNY) pro­vides all of their teach­ing grad­u­ate stu­dents with access to the New York State Health Insur­ance Pro­gram, or NYSHIP. This pro­gram, which is partly sub­si­dized by SUNY, offers full med­ical and pre­scrip­tion cov­er­age with low co-pays, as well as den­tal and vision ben­e­fits. All SUNY grad­u­ate stu­dents who work or teach for the uni­ver­sity are eli­gi­ble for this plan, includ­ing teach­ing assis­tants and fel­lows who, at CUNY, are cur­rently inel­i­gi­ble for the union spon­sored health insur­ance offered through the PSC Wel­fare Fund.

This inequity between SUNY and CUNY has out­raged stu­dents such as Ellen Zitani and Sean Mur­ray, who argue that CUNY grad­u­ate stu­dents should be receiv­ing no less than the same health insur­ance that is pro­vided to SUNY grad­u­ate stu­dents. “SUNY’s grad­u­ate stu­dent work­ers have had access to sub­si­dized health insur­ance since the early 1990s,” said Sean Murray.

Accord­ing to Ellen Zitani, the Grad­u­ate Stu­dent Admin­is­tra­tor for the CUNY Grad­u­ate Cen­ter Office of Stu­dent Affairs, the total annual cost of NYSHIP insur­ance for eli­gi­ble SUNY grad­u­ate stu­dents is $114.96 while the total cost for fam­ily cov­er­age is only $996.72 per year. This cost, says Zitani, is sig­nif­i­cantly lower than the cur­rent options avail­able to many CUNY grad­u­ate stu­dents and teach­ing fel­lows who qual­ify for the GHI plan offered by CUNY. The GHI plan, accord­ing to Zitani, costs indi­vid­u­als $2,396.76 annu­ally, while fam­ily cov­er­age is a shock­ing $6,830.88 per year. “This dis­par­ity is out­ra­geous,” said Zitani, adding that the “options avail­able to CUNY grad­u­ate stu­dents (many of whom are employ­ees of the state of New York through the CUNY sys­tem) are inad­e­quate and gen­er­ally unaffordable.”

Respond­ing, in part to this increas­ing pres­sure from stu­dents, the Grad­u­ate Cen­ter admin­is­tra­tion – includ­ing Pres­i­dent Bill Kelly and the Office of stu­dent Affairs – along with CUNY Chan­cel­lor Gold­stein, have begun urg­ing the New York state leg­is­la­ture to ear­mark funds for the cre­ation of a CUNY Health Insur­ance pro­gram com­pa­ra­ble to what is offered at SUNY. Although, accord­ing to Pres­i­dent Kelly, the Chancellor’s office had already requested funds for GC Grad­u­ate stu­dent health insur­ance in its Novem­ber bud­get request, any actual request for a SUNY-style plan did not come until March. In a let­ter dated March 13, 2008 to the Chairs of the state Com­mit­tee on Higher Edu­ca­tion, Sen­a­tor Ken­neth LaValle and Assem­blyper­son Deb­o­rah Glick, Chan­cel­lor Gold­stein and Pres­i­dent Kelly requested funds for CUNY grad­u­ate stu­dent health insur­ance, and laid out the esti­mated cost of a SUNY style pro­gram at CUNY.

CUNY doc­toral stu­dent par­tic­i­pa­tion in SEPH or a com­pa­ra­ble plan would cost New York State approx­i­mately $2.6 mil­lion (2,300 stu­dents at $1,125 each, using the 2007 cost of SEPH at SUNY Stony Brook). Fund­ing should come from an appro­pri­ate state source out­side of CUNY’s oper­at­ing budget.

How­ever, although Kelly is opti­mistic about these attempts to acquire health insur­ance in the long run, he has been less than opti­mistic about the actual chances that any of this will come to fruition shortly. In a recent let­ter to the GC com­mu­nity Kelly argued that time­lines would be disin­gen­u­ous, sug­gest­ing that any health insur­ance ini­tia­tives would be sub­ject to avail­abil­ity of state funds. Said Kelly, “I am con­vinced that we are mov­ing in the right direc­tion and that we will ulti­mately reach our goal, but the cur­rent fis­cal cir­cum­stances of the state, and by exten­sion those of the uni­ver­sity, are such that time-lines are disingenuous.”

Sim­i­larly, Assem­blyper­son Glick has pub­licly said she sup­ports find­ing some kind of solu­tion to the health insur­ance prob­lem for CUNY stu­dents, but her office has been less than enthu­si­as­tic about the pos­si­bil­ity of pro­vid­ing par­ity any­time soon. Speak­ing to The GC Advo­cate, Glick made it clear that there would likely be no move­ment on the issue dur­ing this year’s bud­get debate, say­ing “It’s obvi­ously a very dif­fi­cult year with dete­ri­o­rat­ing eco­nomic cir­cum­stances. Con­sid­er­ing what we’re fac­ing with the new governor’s recent dec­la­ra­tions [about 3.35% cuts to SUNY and CUNY] we will be scram­bling to main­tain basic support.”

Glick also said that “we cer­tainly would like to see par­ity but it’s a finan­cial issue that may in part be asso­ci­ated with col­lec­tive bar­gain­ing,” sug­gest­ing that any grad­u­ate stu­dent health insur­ance gains may be put on hold until they can be nego­ti­ated by the Pro­fes­sional Staff Congress.

State Sen­a­tor Liz Kreuger’s office was also pes­simistic about the prospects of get­ting any­thing done this bud­get round. Travis Proulx of Sen­a­tor Krueger’s office said that “she does sup­port equal health care access,” but added that “as far as get­ting it into this year’s bud­get no promises can be made, but peo­ple will try.”

More enthu­si­as­tic about pro­vid­ing par­ity is Repub­li­can state Sen­a­tor Ser­phin Mal­tese of Queens, who is call­ing on LaValle and Glick to pro­vide money in the bud­get for CUNY health care now. Vicky Vat­timo, Maltese’s chief of staff told The GC Advo­cate that “the sen­a­tor totally sup­ports pro­vid­ing health insur­ance par­ity to CUNY stu­dents and has asked that it be put in the 2009 bud­get.” Vat­timo added that “the sen­a­tor has indi­cated that if it is cut he will try to get it done legislatively.”

Although most of the recent dis­cus­sions about GC stu­dent health insur­ance, both at CUNY and in Albany, have focused on pro­vid­ing par­ity with SUNY by pro­vid­ing care for work­ing grad­u­ate stu­dents, some have argued that the pro­posed plan is still not ade­quate. Because the university’s pro­posed plan would cover only grad­u­ate stu­dents who work for the state, some are argu­ing that this sys­tem would only per­pet­u­ate and dupli­cate many of the inequities that already exist between those grad­u­ate stu­dents at the GC who are cov­ered by the Wel­fare Fund and those who do not teach or who have fel­low­ships and there­fore are not eli­gi­ble for the PSC spon­sored health insur­ance pro­gram. Carl Lind­skoog, who leads the DSC’s Adjunct Project, said that he was delighted about the Chancellor’s and the President’s calls for a health insur­ance sys­tem for doc­toral stu­dents at CUNY, but added that,

We are con­cerned that Chan­cel­lor Gold­stein and Pres­i­dent Kelly are only call­ing for health insur­ance for doc­toral stu­dents and only those that are employed by CUNY. What about master’s and doc­toral stu­dents that are not work­ing at CUNY? We need a health insur­ance sys­tem for all CUNY grad­u­ate stu­dents, not just doc­toral stu­dents who are employed as grad­u­ate or teach­ing assistants.”

Posted by Advocate Staff on Apr 15th, 2008 and filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

Leave a Reply