Grab our RSS Feed

It Can’t Happen Here: Or Has It?

by Advocate Staff


Yes. Why are you afraid of the word ‘Fas­cism,’ Dore­mus? Just a word – just a word! And might not be so bad, with all the lazy bums we got pan­han­dling relief nowa­days, and liv­ing on my income tax and yours – not so worse to have a real Strong Man, like Hitler or Mussolini…”

– Sin­clair Lewis, It Can’t Hap­pen Here

The media and media watch groups have been abuzz this week with talk about the recently revealed “Pres­i­den­tial Advance Man­ual,” which lays out the tac­tics the Exec­u­tive branch uses to con­trol, limit, and silence protest and polit­i­cal speech at all pub­lic pres­i­den­tial events. Most cov­er­age of the document’s release, includ­ing a Slate col­umn pub­lished Aug. 20th, 2007 have responded with humor­ous chuck­les and char­ac­ter­is­tic lib­eral cyn­i­cism see­ing the man­ual as just another exam­ple of Repub­li­can malfea­sance, stu­pid­ity, or hubris. Although the manual’s tac­tics are indeed some­times laugh­able, the exis­tence of the pub­li­ca­tion, and the con­se­quences of its use should be a wake up call to any­one who takes their own free­doms and democ­racy for granted. The man­ual, which was acquired through court pro­ceed­ings related to a case the Amer­i­can Civil Lib­er­ties Union brought against the President’s office, is now avail­able online for any­one with the incli­na­tion to read it.

Although all but about four pages of the 103 page doc­u­ment have been redacted (one shud­ders to imag­ine the “unknown unknowns” con­tained therein) those sev­eral pas­sages reveal, with star­tling direct­ness, the degree to which this exec­u­tive branch in par­tic­u­lar, but the US gov­ern­ment more broadly has sought to pro­mote cer­tain kinds of pub­lic speech, while actively seek­ing to sup­press oth­ers. The doc­u­ment, which includes bold sec­tions on “Crowd Rais­ing” “Pre­vent­ing Demon­stra­tors,” and “Han­dling Demon­stra­tors,” include some of the fol­low­ing rec­om­men­da­tions for deal­ing with any abnor­mally vocal cit­i­zenry. If demon­stra­tors are dis­cov­ered at an event, the man­ual rec­om­mends, in dis­turbingly mil­i­tant lan­guage that: “Rally squads…be dis­patched to sur­round and drown out demon­stra­tors imme­di­ately.” The task of these “Rally squads,” as the doc­u­ment describes ear­lier, is

to use their signs and ban­ners as shields between the demon­stra­tors and the main press plat­form. If the demon­stra­tors are yelling, rally squads can begin and lead sup­port­ive chants to drown out the pro­tes­tors (USA! USA! USA!) As a last resort secu­rity should remove the demon­stra­tors from the event site. The rally squads can include, but are not lim­ited to, college/young repub­li­can orga­ni­za­tions, local ath­letic teams, and fraternities/sororities.

Obvi­ously, the idea of soror­ity sis­ters as ide­o­log­i­cal shock troops seems laugh­able on the sur­face, but like all good fas­cists, it appears that Bush’s han­dlers under­stand the polit­i­cal and mil­i­taris­tic value of enthu­si­as­tic and patri­otic youth, and the image of cheer­lead­ing col­lege stu­dents shout­ing “USA! USA! USA!” – a scene almost straight out of Lewis’s night­mare vision of Amer­i­can fas­cism – is unnerv­ingly rem­i­nis­cent of sim­i­lar youth­ful pop­u­lar ral­lies in Ger­many and Italy in the 30s and 40s. Like these pre­vi­ous regimes, which man­aged to recruit mil­lions of ordi­nary free­dom lov­ing cit­i­zens to geno­cide and mur­der, despite their own best inter­ests, our gov­ern­ment is in the process of influ­enc­ing and man­ag­ing pub­lic opin­ion for the inter­ests of a small elite, shield­ing the press from images of dis­sent, and manip­u­lat­ing impres­sion­able young recruits for the cause of the “homeland.”

Mean­while in New York City, the New York Police Depart­ment con­tin­ues to search the belong­ings of inno­cent sub­way rid­ers, vio­lat­ing their civil lib­er­ties almost daily, and to crack down on and declare ille­gal any pub­lic gath­er­ings of more than 50 peo­ple, while the MTA is run­ning tele­vi­sion ads assert­ing that “1,944 New York­ers saw some­thing and said some­thing,” thank­ing them for keep­ing their eyes and ears open. Of course, the MTA fails to men­tion how many sui­cide bomb­ings have been thwarted by these vig­i­lant cit­i­zens, or how many rid­ers’ rights were vio­lated and their belong­ings ille­gally searched when they became the sub­ject of these investigations.

The NYPD, for its part, has also been remark­ably silent about just how many attacks have been stopped thanks to their “ran­dom” bag searches. As I’ve said before in this space, it seems more than absurd to think any ter­ror­ist with enough sense to put together a bomb would be dumb enough to be deterred by uni­formed guards at a sub­way entrance. All of this manip­u­la­tion and abuse is made pos­si­ble, of course, by the cli­mate of fear and cyn­i­cism that pre­dom­i­nates our cul­ture today. No longer does the gov­ern­ment steal our civil lib­er­ties away from us; it doesn’t have to since so many among us seem so eager to give them away. Indeed, we have been con­vinced that it is in our best inter­ests to remain meek observers and let the pro­fes­sion­als take care of our com­fort and security.

Every time the gov­ern­ment shields dis­sent and pub­lic out­rage from the media, every time the aver­age cit­i­zen stops vig­i­lantly assert­ing their rights in the face of police force, and every time the peo­ple are taught to fear and sus­pect their own neigh­bors, we take one goos­es­tep closer toward total­i­tar­i­an­ism. Lewis’s vision of a per­fect storm of polit­i­cal events lead­ing to an Amer­i­can fas­cist state, although more than sev­enty years old now, seems more rel­e­vant than ever. 

Posted by Advocate Staff on Sep 15th, 2007 and filed under From The Editor's Desk, Opinion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

Leave a Reply