Grab our RSS Feed

Letters to the Editor

by Advocate Staff


To The Editor:

As some­one who con­ceives of democ­racy “as a way of life,” it both­ers me when I see oth­ers who self-identify as “left” engag­ing in behav­ior that dis­cred­its the cause. Case in point: Kevin Bar­rett and the whole “Loose Change” 9 – 11-was-an-inside-job-crowd. These folks are often crit­i­cal of the US gov­ern­ment (which they should be), but then they want every­one to believe that the Bush Admin­is­tra­tion has the brains to pull off a con­spir­acy which makes the story-lines from the com­bined 5 sea­sons of 24 look like some­thing Dr. Bun­sen hatched in his Mup­pet lab? A con­spir­acy as vast as Bar­rett and com­pany envi­sion involves lots of peo­ple, and peo­ple tend to talk. Give me a break guys.

Ditto the “left­ist” stu­dents who dis­rupted Min­ute­man (his orga­ni­za­tion, not his wife’s nick­name for him) Jim Gilchrist’s speech at Colum­bia the first week in Octo­ber. Free­dom of speech, which has allowed many an idea left of the pale to be aired, applies to those whose views we dis­agree with too. Shut­ting guests up and bul­ly­ing them is just as bad if the perp is Bill O’Reilly or the Colum­bia chap­ter of the Inter­na­tional Social­ist Organization.

Peo­ple like Bar­rett and the rowdy left­ies at Colum­bia (maybe they’re angry over all the money they’re lay­ing out for the Colum­bia impri­matur – shoulda gone to the GC guys!) don’t help the cause. They do exactly the oppo­site. What moti­vates them? I think D.H. Lawrence was wrong in his assess­ment of paci­fist Bertrand Russell’s moti­va­tions, but that his words to the philoso­pher could be applied to Bar­rett and the Colum­bia cam­pus row­dies: “It isn’t in the least true that you, your basic self, want ulti­mate peace. You are sat­is­fy­ing in an indi­rect, false way your lust to jab and strike.”

Tony Monchin­ski
Stu­dent in the Polit­i­cal Sci­ence Pro­gram and author of the forth­com­ing “The Pol­i­tics of Edu­ca­tion” (Sense Publishers)

To The Editor:

Defend­ing immi­grants against Min­ute­man vig­i­lantes is vital to us through­out CUNY, our class­mates, the stu­dents we teach and the mul­ti­eth­nic work­ing class of this city. In protest­ing the Min­ute­men, we are help­ing defend lit­er­ally thou­sands of “undoc­u­mented” stu­dents at CUNY. Many are from fam­i­lies that brave dan­ger­ous desert or ocean cross­ings, “Migra” heli­copters and now Min­ute­man vig­i­lantes. In areas around New York (includ­ing Long Island and New Jer­sey), anti-immigrant vig­i­lantes have tar­geted immi­grant day labor­ers for vio­lent attacks. Now the Min­ute­men are push­ing to orga­nize racist vig­i­lantes inside the city itself.

This is not an issue of “free speech” but of defend­ing our­selves against the Min­ute­man racists, who are not a debat­ing soci­ety but an action squad that helps kill immi­grants. They are linked to and have been joined by other fas­cist and vio­lent racist groups like the National Van­guard, National Alliance and KKK. Just five blocks from the Grad Cen­ter on Octo­ber 7, an anti-Mexican rally by the Min­ute­men fea­tured skin­head fas­cists and thugs – one of whom had kicked a Colum­bia pro­tester in the head and was wear­ing a shirt with boot prints and the slo­gan “Stomp Out Ille­gal Immigration” – screaming for more depor­ta­tions and attacks on immi­grants. It is vital that we defend the stu­dents who protested the Min­ute­men at Colum­bia Uni­ver­sity; and that we join with the power of the mul­tira­cial labor move­ment to keep out these mur­der­ous vig­i­lante squads.

San­dor John
Adjunct (His­tory) and sup­porter of the CUNY Inter­na­tion­al­ist Clubs

Posted by Advocate Staff on Oct 15th, 2006 and filed under Opinion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

Leave a Reply