Grab our RSS Feed

Columbia Protesters Oust Minuteman

by Advocate Staff


On Wednes­day, Octo­ber 4th, left lean­ing stu­dent groups from across the city, includ­ing the CUNY Inter­na­tion­al­ist Group, gath­ered to protest a sched­uled speech by the co-founder and spokesman of the Min­ute­man Project Jim Gilchrist. Gilchrist, who was invited by the Colum­bia Col­lege Repub­li­cans, was inter­rupted when a group of stu­dents from Columbia’s Chi­cano Cau­cus climbed on stage with a ban­ner read­ing “Say no to Racism.” The melee that fol­lowed has become the source of a sig­nif­i­cant amount of debate, spark­ing dis­cus­sions of the lim­its of free speech and pub­lic dis­course on cam­puses across the country.

Gilchrist is the author of Min­ute­men: the Bat­tle to Secure America’s Bor­ders and is an out­spo­ken critic of cur­rent immi­gra­tion law. His orga­ni­za­tion aims to pre­vent ille­gal immi­gra­tion across Amer­i­can bor­ders through polit­i­cal action and the cre­ation of cit­i­zen bor­der patrol groups. The Min­ute­men argue that they are “Amer­i­cans doing the job that Con­gress won’t do,” but they have been widely crit­i­cized by many immi­grant groups for sup­port­ing a racist and nativist polit­i­cal agenda. Although Gilchrist and his orga­ni­za­tion have taken pains to sep­a­rate them­selves from racist and nativist groups, many, includ­ing the South­ern Poverty Law Cen­ter, say that the min­ute­man project has become a cover for neo-Nazis and racist extrem­ist groups like the National Alliance, whose mem­bers openly advo­cate vio­lent vig­i­lan­tism on US borders.

Pro­test­ers at Wednesday’s rally posted an offi­cial response to the events on the internet.

Fas­cist scape­goat­ing is not up for aca­d­e­mic dis­cus­sion. Like Hitler in pre-Nazi Ger­many, Gilchrist and the Min­ute­men attempt to demo­nize foreign-born poor peo­ple, blam­ing “ille­gals” for society’s prob­lems. His group doesn’t present rea­soned debate. It spouts racism and hatred, aim­ing to divide people.”

But offi­cial crit­i­cism of the protests was swift and over­whelm­ing. Pres­i­dent Bollinger of Colum­bia Uni­ver­sity responded to the protest­sts in a pub­lic state­ment on Fri­day, con­demn­ing the use of intim­i­da­tion to silence speakers:

It is unac­cept­able to seek to deprive another per­son of his or her right of expres­sion through actions such as tak­ing a stage and inter­rupt­ing the speech. We rightly have a vis­ceral rejec­tion of this behav­ior, because we all sense how easy it is to slide from our col­lec­tive com­mit­ment to the hard work of intel­lec­tual con­fronta­tion to the easy path of phys­i­cal brutish­ness. When the lat­ter hap­pens, we know instinc­tively we are all threatened.”

Sim­i­larly, Mayor Bloomberg crit­i­cized Bollinger and Colum­bia Uni­ver­sity say­ing “I don’t care whether you’re from the hard left, the hard right .… if you get invited, who­ever invites you should have the cour­tesy to let you speak and pro­vide the pro­tec­tion so that you can do it.”

Gilchrist responded that Colum­bia “is a gut­ter school. The stu­dents are not being taught how to learn but how to hate.… It is a shame that we can­not dis­cuss the issues.”

Posted by Advocate Staff on Oct 15th, 2006 and filed under Features. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

Leave a Reply