Grab our RSS Feed

CUNY’s Iraq Vets Seeking New Purpose in Activism

by MStar



Lehman Col­lege senior Desmond Mullins
speaks to pro­tes­tors in New Orleans.

In the days fol­low­ing the ter­ror­ist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, there was an upsurge of patri­o­tism in the United States that engulfed many able-bodied men and women of mil­i­tary age. As a result, these men and women joined the United States mil­i­tary in large num­bers in order to com­bat ter­ror­ism. In con­trast, the men and women who joined before Sept. 11, 2001, had a very dif­fer­ent moti­va­tion. They were pre­dom­i­nantly poor, and used the mil­i­tary as a ticket to a col­lege edu­ca­tion. The City Uni­ver­sity of New York pro­vided a bar­gain for these stu­dents who served in the National Guard or reserve, giv­ing them an afford­able edu­ca­tion and flex­i­bil­ity for their mil­i­tary ser­vice. How­ever, after serv­ing hon­or­ably in Iraq, many of these CUNY stu­dents have returned to a uni­ver­sity that gives the bare min­i­mum of sup­port, in terms of facil­i­tat­ing the tran­si­tion back into col­lege life, get­ting med­ical and men­tal health atten­tion, and con­nect­ing with other stu­dent vet­er­ans. Con­se­quently, these stu­dents need increased assis­tance from the CUNY sys­tem, at least in find­ing other vet­er­ans who can form a com­mu­nity of support.

The basic prob­lem, as told by Iraq vet­er­ans inter­viewed for this arti­cle, is the dearth of infor­ma­tion on how many stu­dents have served in Iraq and where those stu­dents are. Hunter Col­lege junior Fer­nando Braga joined the mil­i­tary for finan­cial rea­sons on Sept. 9, 2001, and served from March 2004 to Jan­u­ary 2005 in Iraq at Camp Cedar II, south of Al Nasiria, as a unit-supply spe­cial­ist. Braga put the num­ber of CUNY stu­dents killed in Iraq at a min­i­mum of five, with at least three casu­al­ties com­ing from Bor­ough of Man­hat­tan Com­mu­nity Col­lege. Stem­ming from this lack of infor­ma­tion, CUNY stu­dents are left with only four resources: their indi­vid­ual ini­tia­tive, the Vet­er­ans Admin­is­tra­tion offi­cial at each col­lege, the efforts of indi­vid­ual pro­fes­sors, and the com­mu­nity pro­vided by Iraq Vet­er­ans Against the War (IVAW), whose New York chap­ter head is Jose Vasquez, an Anthro­pol­ogy Ph.D. stu­dent at CUNY Grad­u­ate Cen­ter. Indi­vid­ual ini­tia­tive is highly depen­dent on the infor­ma­tion pro­vided by the other three resources. Thus, if an Iraq vet­eran does not receive ade­quate infor­ma­tion and help from a college’s VA admin­is­tra­tor, a friendly pro­fes­sor, or IVAW, there is no sup­port for stu­dents who might be deal­ing with, among other things, the hor­ri­ble effects of Post Trau­matic Stress Dis­or­der (PTSD). The effects of PTSD may include night­mares, depres­sion, unpro­voked aggres­sion, and sui­ci­dal tendencies.

Most impor­tant, many, if not all Iraq vet­er­ans, are pre­sented with a Catch-22 upon leav­ing Iraq. In order to expe­dite their jour­ney home, a sol­dier typ­i­cally lies to the mil­i­tary doc­tors dur­ing a 30-second inter­view regard­ing the soldier’s men­tal and phys­i­cal health. After return­ing home, the psy­cho­log­i­cal symp­toms of PTSD, in addi­tion to the phys­i­cal injuries sus­tained in Iraq, cause many vet­er­ans to seek help from the VA Hos­pi­tal, if they can find it. Yet, if they do seek help from the hos­pi­tal, they con­front the high prob­a­bil­ity of stop­ping their mil­i­tary career because the record of men­tal and phys­i­cal ill­ness will limit their oppor­tu­ni­ties. Since the sol­der lied to the mil­i­tary doc­tor to get home more quickly, the mil­i­tary can claim that the men­tal and phys­i­cal ill­nesses were not caused by the com­bat expe­ri­ences. As a result, many Iraq vet­er­ans in the CUNY sys­tem face a very bleak future of lim­ited, or no help for their men­tal and phys­i­cal trau­mas, which in turn alien­ates them from friends and fam­ily. With no sup­port sys­tem, these vet­er­ans often turn to var­i­ous cop­ing mech­a­nisms, includ­ing drugs and alcohol.


Iraq vets in New Orleans set­ting the foun­da­tion
of the first of one hun­dred new homes.

The iso­la­tion of Iraq vet­er­ans in the CUNY sys­tem presents a chal­lenge to them in the class­room. Most stu­dents do not men­tion that they have served in Iraq. The stu­dents who do men­tion their ser­vice in Iraq are mainly those who feel that their ser­vice has spurred them to oppose the war. Lehman Col­lege senior Demond Mullins, who served in Iraq in the infantry from Fall 2004 to Fall 2005, is increas­ingly active in anti-war protests and marches. His Iraq ser­vice became a cat­a­lyst for him to exam­ine his moral stand­ing as a human being, and to pre­vent other peo­ple from suf­fer­ing as he did. Like­wise, Michael Har­mon, a stu­dent at Bor­ough of Man­hat­tan Com­mu­nity Col­lege, suf­fered from depres­sion after serv­ing a year in Iraq as a com­bat medic for 1/67 armor 4th Infantry Divi­sion from April 2003 to April 2004. He has since become very active in IVAW.

The respon­sive­ness of CUNY to its Iraq vet­er­ans varies from col­lege to col­lege, depend­ing largely on whether the VA rep­re­sen­ta­tive is a sep­a­rate posi­tion or com­bined with other admin­is­tra­tive posi­tions at the col­lege. Fer­nando Braga noted a con­sen­sus among vet­er­ans that Bor­ough of Man­hat­tan Com­mu­nity Col­lege is among the worst in terms of pro­vid­ing sup­port for vet­er­ans, while Baruch, Lehman, Hunter, and the other four year col­leges are much bet­ter. This is evi­denced by the expe­ri­ences of Mullins, who expe­ri­enced a very easy tran­si­tion back in to col­lege life at Lehman, and Gus­tavo Agosto-Dafonseca, who also had an easy expe­ri­ence. Agosto-Dafonseca has done 24 months of active duty, and he has 18 months left of drill train­ing in the Army Reserves in Fort Drum, N.Y. He served in Iraq for 11 months, three weeks, from Jan. 13 to Dec. 26, 2005. He returned to Baruch Col­lege with four incom­plete grades at the upper sopho­more level. He sayid Baruch was very sup­port­ive, includ­ing pro­fes­sors and the VA coor­di­na­tor. He was able to extend the incom­plete grades until the end of spring of his sixth semester.

Anti-War Activism

After they have returned from Iraq and resumed civil­ian and stu­dent life, the sin­gu­lar chal­lenge to these vet­er­ans is how much they inte­grate their com­bat expe­ri­ence with their iden­tity. One of the vet­er­ans who has not cho­sen to engage in anti-war activ­i­ties is Gus­tavo Agosto-Dafonseca. He has always treated the mil­i­tary as a hobby, as a side part of his life, not as a key part of how he defines him­self. He entered in 2000, at age 17 with parental con­sent, and was the first per­son in his fam­ily to join. His main moti­va­tion was obtain­ing money for col­lege. He was told by the recruit­ing offi­cer that at most he would serve a six-month peace­keep­ing mis­sion in Bosnia. Yet, at that age he was cir­cum­spect about the role that he wanted the mil­i­tary to play in his life. “The mis­take many young sol­diers make, unfor­tu­nately, is to become depen­dent,” he said, espe­cially if they are young. They get food, cloth­ing, and shel­ter, and typ­i­cally go from an $8/hour job to a $15,000 sign­ing bonus. In con­trast, Agosto-Dafonseca said, “I wasn’t blinded by the money,” even though he had wanted to join the mil­i­tary since watch­ing Desert Storm on CNN.

Agosto-Dafonseca said he didn’t need to join, even though a lot of enlist­ment deci­sions come from “need­ing the mil­i­tary” because a sol­dier has no other options in life, no idea of col­lege options, and receives full finan­cial aid in the mil­i­tary. Thus, while Agosto-Dafonseca is not an activist, not against mil­i­tary ser­vice, and not against peo­ple serv­ing in the mil­i­tary, he is against “irre­spon­si­ble enlistment.”

Many of the sol­diers Agosto-Dafonseca served with were in the National Guard unit, in con­trast to the active duty sol­diers who see com­bat 24 hours a day. His com­rades joined the mil­i­tary mainly as a response to 9/11. The reserve and National Guard are filled pri­mar­ily by sol­diers who are there part-time, and typ­i­cally they are col­lege stu­dents. Thus, in the Tikrit area where he served, he said many of his fel­low sol­diers were dis­ap­pointed that their expec­ta­tions of fight­ing ter­ror­ists had not become real­ity. Gus­tavo did not see any of his col­leagues killed. He served in a 15-person unit doing move­ment con­trol, or logis­tics, which meant mon­i­tor­ing all mil­i­tary vehi­cle and air craft that were com­ing into and out of his area of respon­si­bil­ity. He worked in a divi­sion com­mand cen­ter with gen­eral officers.

Since Agosto-Dafonseca com­pleted his Soci­ol­ogy major at Baruch before he went to Iraq, he was able to be an observer. Thus, he thinks of his expe­ri­ence there as “more observer than par­tic­i­pant.” This was partly an effort to retain his san­ity, and partly an effort to be desen­si­tized but under­stand­ing. His col­leagues were in the 18 – 24 year old demo­graphic, fel­low col­lege stu­dents who had inter­rupted their col­lege experience.

Agosto-Dafonseca suc­ceeded in main­tain­ing his detached per­spec­tive, and so he has not felt a need to engage in any anti-war activ­i­ties. He is hon­or­ing his con­tract with the mil­i­tary, which ends in 2008. The con­tract stip­u­lates that any anti-war activ­ity will be met with puni­tive measures.

In con­trast, Mullins and Michael Har­mon have immersed them­selves in anti-war activ­i­ties as the main way to give their lives a sense of pur­pose and mean­ing again. Mullins appears in a doc­u­men­tary on Iraq vet­er­ans called “The Ground Truth”, which he sayid is a very truth­ful, hon­est depic­tion of the expe­ri­ences of troops in Iraq. The “hon­esty is fierce, it’s raw” because it shows that most sol­diers in com­bat turned out to be against the war. Mullins has devoted his life to anti-war activ­i­ties because he feels he com­pro­mised his morals and his virtues by allow­ing him­self to be sent to Iraq. Before he was sent to Iraq, he says he had dif­fi­culty being a civil­ian, includ­ing being a boyfriend, a son, and a stu­dent. After he returned from Iraq he felt aban­doned. This is com­mon because “lots of sol­diers have trou­ble find­ing pur­pose,” and many have trou­ble tak­ing con­trol of their own lives. Thus, tak­ing classes at Lehman Col­lege offered not only struc­ture but a sense of pur­pose, a way to focus his life so that he could under­stand the role he played in what he now rec­og­nizes as the Military-Industrial Com­plex. He started to read “The Power Elite,” by C. Wright Mills, while serv­ing in Iraq. After he became a stu­dent again, he started learn­ing about mil­i­tary indus­trial com­plex the­ory. He now intends to go to grad­u­ate school in order to aug­ment his activist activities.

Mullins joined the mil­i­tary because he oth­er­wise couldn’t afford a col­lege edu­ca­tion. He was “just like [an] aver­age under­grad­u­ate stu­dent” before serv­ing in Bagh­dad from Fall 2004 to Fall 2005. He never voted because he didn’t feel like he had much of a say, even though he found pol­i­tics inter­est­ing. In con­trast to his pre­vi­ous civil­ian life, “Iraq showed how small I am, this is only life I have.” So Mullins is on a mis­sion to make amends for his prior complacency.

After return­ing from Iraq, Mullins iso­lated him­self and fell into a depres­sion from which Lehman Col­lege and activism res­cued him. He had dif­fi­cul­ties with his girl­friend, fam­ily, and friends because of his PTSD. He would squeeze his ex-girlfriend dur­ing the night and would start cry­ing with­out know­ing why. He would feel dis­ori­ented all of a sud­den. He wouldn’t talk some­times. He was less affec­tion­ate, more cal­lous. He devel­oped the atti­tude that the petty things peo­ple wor­ried about as civil­ians couldn’t com­pare in mag­ni­tude to the hor­ri­ble things he saw in com­bat. He also felt that, given the num­ber of close calls and near misses he had with death in Iraq, his luck had run out, and so he was sim­ply wait­ing to die. The VA Hos­pi­tal offered him med­ica­tion for his symp­toms, but he didn’t take any. Instead, he decided that “activism is most therapeutic.”

The turn­ing point came when Gail Perry-Ryder, an Adjunct Lec­turer in the Depart­ment of African and African Amer­i­can Stud­ies at Lehman Col­lege, gave Mullins the con­tact infor­ma­tion for IVAW. The IVAW, in con­junc­tion with the small class sizes at Lehman, helped lift Mullins from his depres­sion and even gave him hope. The small class sizes facil­i­tated more per­sonal atten­tion from pro­fes­sors, even though CUNY lacks any type of insti­tu­tional sup­port for Iraq vet­er­ans. Mullins has taken his activism to higher lev­els in the past six months, from appear­ing in the doc­u­men­tary to march­ing from Mobile, Ala., to New Orleans, La. The march helped raise aware­ness about the con­nec­tion between lim­ited recon­struc­tion of the Gulf Coast after Hur­ri­cane Kat­rina com­pared to the expen­sive recon­struc­tion projects in Iraq.

All of the vet­er­ans inter­viewed for this arti­cle agreed that CUNY could do much more to help its Iraq War vet­er­ans, espe­cially because the Vet­er­ans Admin­is­tra­tion has fal­tered so badly in pro­vid­ing the sup­port that it is oblig­ated to pro­vide. Agosto-Dafonseca and Mullins both men­tioned that bud­get cuts at the VA had lim­ited the VA’s abil­ity to pro­vide needed sup­port. If CUNY could take up the slack, even by sim­ply help­ing Iraq vet­er­ans find each other through a list-serve or data­base, that would go a long way toward fill­ing a great need, Mullins said. The vet­er­ans say they are very will­ing to put an effort into estab­lish­ing a CUNY-wide orga­ni­za­tion that will help them develop a cohe­sive com­mu­nity. Right now, that com­mu­nity doesn’t exist.

Patri­o­tism

When asked whether they were patri­otic, many of the vet­er­ans replied that they did not believe in blind, unin­formed patri­o­tism, yet they all love their coun­try. “Patri­o­tism is an ugly word,” Mullins said. “Aside from feel­ings of pride that one should have in their nation and a sense of respon­si­bil­ity, Amer­i­cans espe­cially should be more dis­cern­ing in terms of their nation, and the admin­is­tra­tion of its poli­cies. Sup­port­ing the Pres­i­dent because he is Pres­i­dent is mean­ing­less. If patri­o­tism is sup­port­ing the best inter­ests of the nation, then yes, I’m a patriot with my whole heart. I was never a blind patriot of the U.S. I’m a black man. That’s a mouth­ful already. Look at Amer­i­can his­tory, there isn’t much for me to feel patri­otic about.” Mullins said his level of patri­o­tism remains the same, but he has a great deal more inter­est in pol­i­tics and pol­icy. Most impor­tant, Mullins said Iraq gave him the abil­ity to make pos­i­tive changes, because now “I fear noth­ing.” He said he feels a respon­si­bil­ity to ful­fill a des­tiny. “I have a fer­vent desire to acquire knowl­edge now. Schol­ar­ship val­i­dates activism.”

Sim­i­larly, Michael Har­mon feels that all patri­o­tism has been sapped out of him, and now the only thing that replaces it is anti-war activism. “I have NO patri­o­tism and NO faith in the direc­tion this coun­try is going. … Peo­ple just don’t care because it doesn’t affect them per­son­ally. Activism is the best thing I have ever got involved in and it has made me smarter and more informed.” Michael found two vet­er­ans who also served in Oper­a­tion Iraqi Free­dom though the doc­u­men­tary “The Ground Truth.” Other than those, has hasn’t found a vet­eran com­mu­nity because of what he calls “the apa­thy that plagues this country.”

Thus, right now Iraq Vet­er­ans Against the War (IVAW) is the only place where Iraq vet­er­ans in the CUNY sys­tem are likely to find a com­mu­nity, and a way to heal through activism. Jose Vasquez, the New York head of IVAW, and a 4th year, Level 2, Anthro­pol­ogy grad­u­ate stu­dent, comes to activism from a 14-year his­tory in the mil­i­tary. He has not gone to Iraq even though he was offi­cially sent because he claimed to be a Con­sci­en­tious Objec­tor. As his claim is still pend­ing,. he has left mil­i­tary life, where oth­er­wise he would now be a Sergeant First Class. He started out lov­ing the mil­i­tary, and aimed to become a Mas­ter Sergeant, but the rup­ture came on Sept. 11, 2001, when he started hear­ing com­par­isons of the ter­ror­ist attacks to the Japan­ese attacks on Pearl Har­bor on Dec. 7, 1941, the start of America’s entry to World War II. At the time he had made a pro­fes­sional tran­si­tion to Emer­gency Med­ical Tech­ni­cian, and was a senior at City Col­lege with an Anthro­pol­ogy major. How­ever, he is mar­ried to a Japan­ese woman, and had recently com­pleted a book about the effects of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. He decided that he did not want the United States to go down a sim­i­lar path to the nuclear destruc­tion of other cities after the ter­ror­ist attack.

The key prob­lem with the mil­i­tary, Vasquez said, is that the demo­graph­ics have changed com­pletely since World War II. Most sol­diers in the past had at most a GED or high school diploma. Now, the sol­diers may be col­lege under­grad­u­ates, master’s stu­dents, or even have a Ph.D. By giv­ing enlisted sol­diers access to higher edu­ca­tion, mass media and the Inter­net, these sol­diers are more likely to have opin­ions that con­tra­dict the deci­sions of offi­cers. Con­se­quently, Vasquez offered a scathing opin­ion of the sit­u­a­tion in Iraq and the respon­si­bil­ity of the United States Con­gress. He noted that the U.S. mil­i­tary is very well equipped to do the invad­ing part, but guerilla war­fare has not changed over thou­sands of years. As a result, suc­cess­ful occu­pa­tion of a for­eign coun­try requires intense oppres­sion, espe­cially since it is impos­si­ble to dis­tin­guish civil­ians from com­bat­ants. How­ever, even if there were more troops, the under­ly­ing pre­tense of the inva­sion under­mines it. Agosto-Dafonseca agreed that only cul­tural aware­ness will make a dif­fer­ence, not more troops. The U.S. has taken power by lev­el­ing the Iraqi infra­struc­ture, and set­ting up a polit­i­cal struc­ture that does not include all voices. Thus, the insur­gency is a polit­i­cal upris­ing, and there needs to be dia­logue with the insur­gency. The best out­come in Iraq is a sched­uled with­drawal to avoid mak­ing Iraq depen­dent on the U.S. Vasquez argued that the U.S. con­gress must reassert itself vis-à-vis the pres­i­dent, and this includes impeach­ing the pres­i­dent for war crimes. “The exec­u­tive branch has come in like the Mafia and taken over. Impeach­ment would be jus­tice served. George Bush is a war crim­i­nal. The war of aggres­sion against Iraq is the biggest war crime in a long time.”

Posted by MStar on Sep 15th, 2006 and filed under Features. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

Leave a Reply